Atomic Force Microscopes Comprehensive Study by Type (Contact AFM, Non-contact AFM, Dynamic contact AFM, Tapping AFM), Application (Material Science, Life Sciences, Semiconductors and Electronics, Academics), Grade (Industrial, Research) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2027

Atomic Force Microscopes Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027 | CAGR: 5.1%  

  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Industry Background:
Atomic Force Microscopes is defined as type of scanning probe microscope which majorly includes measuring properties such as magnetism, height, friction. AFM was invented by these scientist Gerd Binning, Calvin Quate and Christoph Gerber. Silicon is used in Atomic force Microscope. AFM used to image the topography of soft biological materials in their native environments. Some of applications of atomic force microbes Identifying atoms from samples, Evaluating force interactions between atoms, studying the physical changing properties of atoms, studying the structural and mechanical properties of protein complexes and assembly, such as microtubules, used to differentiate cancer cells and normal cells and Evaluating and differentiating neighbouring cells and their shape and cell wall rigidity. According to AMA Research, the market for Atomic Force Microscopes is expected to register a CAGR of 5.1% during the forecast period to 2027. This growth is primarily driven by Increasing demand in Rand D development of microscopes.

AttributesDetails
Study Period2017-2027
Base Year2021
Forecast Period2022-2027
Volume UnitN
Value UnitUSD (Million)
Key Companies in StudyBruker (United States), Park Systems (South Korea), Oxford Instruments (United Kingdom), Horiba (Japan), Hitachi High-Tech (Japan), Nanosurf (Switzerland), WITec (Germany), NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments (Russia), NanoMagnetics Instruments (United Kingdom), Nanonics Imaging (Israel), AFM Workshop (United States), Attocube Systems (Germany), Anton Paar (Austria) and Concept Scientific Instruments (France)
Customization ScopeAvail customization with purchase of this report. Add or modify country, region & or narrow down segments in the final scope subject to feasibility


The Life Sciences Tools & Services sector in the region has been increasing at a sustainable rate and further growth is expected to be witnessed over the forecast period, owing to the robust investments and expansion in production facilities in the region. Major Players, such as Bruker (United States), Park Systems (South Korea), Oxford Instruments (United Kingdom), Horiba (Japan), Hitachi High-Tech (Japan), Nanosurf (Switzerland), WITec (Germany), NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments (Russia), NanoMagnetics Instruments (United Kingdom), Nanonics Imaging (Israel), AFM Workshop (United States), Attocube Systems (Germany), Anton Paar (Austria) and Concept Scientific Instruments (France), etc have either set up their manufacturing facilities or are planning to start new provision in the dominated region in the upcoming years.

In 2021, Park Systems, the fastest growing manufacturer of Atomic Force Microscopes (AFM) just announced Park FX40. Park FX40, a ground breaking autonomous atomic force microscope, filled with innovative robotics, intelligent learning features, safety mechanisms, AI based software and specialized add-ons.The global market is highly competitive and consists of a limited number of providers who compete with each other. The intense competition, changing consumer spending patterns, demographic trends, and frequent changes in consumer preferences pose significant opportunities for market growth.

Atomic Force Microscopes Market Dynamics:
AttributesDetails
Growth Drivers
  • Increasing demand in Rand D development of microscopes
Influencing Trends
  • Growing Dominance of China in APAC Region
Restraints
  • Loss of samples due to contact mode
Road Blocks / Challenges
  • Unskilled labours for handling microscopes
Gaps & Opportunities
  • Growing investments in production


AMA Research follows a focused and realistic research framework that provides the ability to study the crucial market dynamics in several regions across the world. Moreover, an in-depth assessment is mainly conducted by our analysts on geographical regions to provide clients and businesses the opportunity to dominate in niche markets and expand in emerging markets across the globe. This market research study also showcases the spontaneously changing Players landscape impacting the market's growth. Furthermore, our market researchers extensively analyze the products and services offered by multiple players competing to increase their market share and presence.

Data Sources of Atomic Force Microscopes Market Study

Primary Collection: InMail, LinkedIn Groups, Survey Monkey, Google, and Other professional Forums are some of the medium utilized to gather primary data through key industry participants and appointees, subject-matter experts, C-level executives of Atomic Force Microscopes Industry, among others including independent industry consultants, experts, to obtain and verify critical qualitative commentary and opinion and quantitative statistics, to assess future market prospects.

The primary interviews and data collected as per the below protocols:
• By Designation: C-Level, D-Level, Others
• By Company Type: Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3

Secondary Data Sources such as Annual reports, Press releases, Analyst meetings, Conference calls, Investor presentations, Management statements, SEC filings of Atomic Force Microscopes players along with Regulatory Sites, Association, World bank, etc were used as sources secondary set of data.

Customization in the Report
AMA Research features not only specific market forecasts but also includes significant value-added commentary on:
- Market Trends
- Technological Trends and Innovations
- Market Maturity Indicators
- Growth Drivers and Constraints
- New Entrants into the Market & Entry/Exit Barriers
- To Seize Powerful Market Opportunities
- Identify Key Business Segments, Market Proposition & Gap Analysis

Against this Challenging Backdrop, Atomic Force Microscopes Study Sheds Light on
— The Atomic Force Microscopes Market status quo and key characteristics. To end this, Analysts at AMA organize and took surveys of the Atomic Force Microscopes industry Players. The resultant snapshot serves as a basis for understanding why and how the industry can be expected to change.
— Where Atomic Force Microscopes industry is heading and what are the top priorities. Insights are drawn from financial analysis, the survey, and interviews with key executives and industry experts.
— How every company in this diverse set of Players can best navigate the emerging competition landscape and follow a strategy that helps them position to hold the value they currently claim or capture the new addressable opportunity.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Contact AFM
  • Non-contact AFM
  • Dynamic contact AFM
  • Tapping AFM
By Application
  • Material Science
  • Life Sciences
  • Semiconductors and Electronics
  • Academics
By Grade
  • Industrial
  • Research

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Increasing demand in Rand D development of microscopes
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Unskilled labours for handling microscopes
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Growing Dominance of China in APAC Region
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type, Application, Grade and Region (value) (2016-2021)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Atomic Force Microscopes (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Atomic Force Microscopes by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Contact AFM
        • 5.2.1.2. Non-contact AFM
        • 5.2.1.3. Dynamic contact AFM
        • 5.2.1.4. Tapping AFM
      • 5.2.2. Global Atomic Force Microscopes by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Material Science
        • 5.2.2.2. Life Sciences
        • 5.2.2.3. Semiconductors and Electronics
        • 5.2.2.4. Academics
      • 5.2.3. Global Atomic Force Microscopes by: Grade (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Industrial
        • 5.2.3.2. Research
      • 5.2.4. Global Atomic Force Microscopes Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Atomic Force Microscopes: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2021)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Bruker (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Park Systems (South Korea)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Oxford Instruments (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Horiba (Japan)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Hitachi High-Tech (Japan)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Nanosurf (Switzerland)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. WITec (Germany)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments (Russia)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. NanoMagnetics Instruments (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Nanonics Imaging (Israel)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.11. AFM Workshop (United States)
        • 6.4.11.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.11.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.11.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.11.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.12. Attocube Systems (Germany)
        • 6.4.12.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.12.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.12.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.12.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.13. Anton Paar (Austria)
        • 6.4.13.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.13.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.13.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.13.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.14. Concept Scientific Instruments (France)
        • 6.4.14.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.14.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.14.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.14.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Atomic Force Microscopes Sale, by Type, Application, Grade and Region (value) (2022-2027)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Atomic Force Microscopes (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Atomic Force Microscopes by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Contact AFM
        • 7.2.1.2. Non-contact AFM
        • 7.2.1.3. Dynamic contact AFM
        • 7.2.1.4. Tapping AFM
      • 7.2.2. Global Atomic Force Microscopes by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Material Science
        • 7.2.2.2. Life Sciences
        • 7.2.2.3. Semiconductors and Electronics
        • 7.2.2.4. Academics
      • 7.2.3. Global Atomic Force Microscopes by: Grade (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Industrial
        • 7.2.3.2. Research
      • 7.2.4. Global Atomic Force Microscopes Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Atomic Force Microscopes: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Atomic Force Microscopes Contact AFM , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 3. Atomic Force Microscopes Non-contact AFM , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 4. Atomic Force Microscopes Dynamic contact AFM , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 5. Atomic Force Microscopes Tapping AFM , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 6. Atomic Force Microscopes: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 7. Atomic Force Microscopes Material Science , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 8. Atomic Force Microscopes Life Sciences , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 9. Atomic Force Microscopes Semiconductors and Electronics , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 10. Atomic Force Microscopes Academics , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 11. Atomic Force Microscopes: by Grade(USD Million)
  • Table 12. Atomic Force Microscopes Industrial , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 13. Atomic Force Microscopes Research , by Region USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 14. South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 15. South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 16. South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 17. South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 18. Brazil Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 19. Brazil Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 20. Brazil Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 21. Argentina Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 22. Argentina Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 23. Argentina Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 24. Rest of South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 25. Rest of South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 26. Rest of South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 27. Asia Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 28. Asia Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 29. Asia Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 30. Asia Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 31. China Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 32. China Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 33. China Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 34. Japan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 35. Japan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 36. Japan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 37. India Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 38. India Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 39. India Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 40. South Korea Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 41. South Korea Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 42. South Korea Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 43. Taiwan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 44. Taiwan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 45. Taiwan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 46. Australia Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 47. Australia Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 48. Australia Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 49. Rest of Asia-Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 50. Rest of Asia-Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 51. Rest of Asia-Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 52. Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 53. Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 54. Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 55. Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 56. Germany Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 57. Germany Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 58. Germany Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 59. France Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 60. France Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 61. France Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 62. Italy Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 63. Italy Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 64. Italy Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 65. United Kingdom Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 66. United Kingdom Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 67. United Kingdom Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 68. Netherlands Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 69. Netherlands Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 70. Netherlands Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 71. Rest of Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 72. Rest of Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 73. Rest of Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 74. MEA Atomic Force Microscopes, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 75. MEA Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 76. MEA Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 77. MEA Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 78. Middle East Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 79. Middle East Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 80. Middle East Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 81. Africa Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 82. Africa Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 83. Africa Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 84. North America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Country USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 85. North America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 86. North America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 87. North America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 88. United States Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 89. United States Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 90. United States Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 91. Canada Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 92. Canada Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 93. Canada Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 94. Mexico Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 95. Mexico Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 96. Mexico Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Table 97. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 98. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 99. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 100. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 101. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 102. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 103. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 104. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 105. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 106. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 107. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 108. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 109. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 110. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 111. Atomic Force Microscopes: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 112. Atomic Force Microscopes Contact AFM , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 113. Atomic Force Microscopes Non-contact AFM , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 114. Atomic Force Microscopes Dynamic contact AFM , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 115. Atomic Force Microscopes Tapping AFM , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 116. Atomic Force Microscopes: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 117. Atomic Force Microscopes Material Science , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 118. Atomic Force Microscopes Life Sciences , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 119. Atomic Force Microscopes Semiconductors and Electronics , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 120. Atomic Force Microscopes Academics , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 121. Atomic Force Microscopes: by Grade(USD Million)
  • Table 122. Atomic Force Microscopes Industrial , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 123. Atomic Force Microscopes Research , by Region USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 124. South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 125. South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 126. South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 127. South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 128. Brazil Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 129. Brazil Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 130. Brazil Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 131. Argentina Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 132. Argentina Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 133. Argentina Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 134. Rest of South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 135. Rest of South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 136. Rest of South America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 137. Asia Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 138. Asia Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 139. Asia Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 140. Asia Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 141. China Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 142. China Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 143. China Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 144. Japan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 145. Japan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 146. Japan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 147. India Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 148. India Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 149. India Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 150. South Korea Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 151. South Korea Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 152. South Korea Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 153. Taiwan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 154. Taiwan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 155. Taiwan Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 156. Australia Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 157. Australia Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 158. Australia Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 159. Rest of Asia-Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 160. Rest of Asia-Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 161. Rest of Asia-Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 162. Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 163. Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 164. Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 165. Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 166. Germany Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 167. Germany Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 168. Germany Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 169. France Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 170. France Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 171. France Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 172. Italy Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 173. Italy Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 174. Italy Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 175. United Kingdom Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 176. United Kingdom Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 177. United Kingdom Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 178. Netherlands Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 179. Netherlands Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 180. Netherlands Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 181. Rest of Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 182. Rest of Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 183. Rest of Europe Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 184. MEA Atomic Force Microscopes, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 185. MEA Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 186. MEA Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 187. MEA Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 188. Middle East Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 189. Middle East Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 190. Middle East Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 191. Africa Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 192. Africa Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 193. Africa Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 194. North America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Country USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 195. North America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 196. North America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 197. North America Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 198. United States Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 199. United States Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 200. United States Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 201. Canada Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 202. Canada Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 203. Canada Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 204. Mexico Atomic Force Microscopes, by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 205. Mexico Atomic Force Microscopes, by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 206. Mexico Atomic Force Microscopes, by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Table 207. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 208. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 209. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Atomic Force Microscopes: by Type USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Figure 5. Global Atomic Force Microscopes: by Application USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Figure 6. Global Atomic Force Microscopes: by Grade USD Million (2016-2021)
  • Figure 7. South America Atomic Force Microscopes Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Atomic Force Microscopes Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Atomic Force Microscopes Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Atomic Force Microscopes Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Atomic Force Microscopes share by Players 2021 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Atomic Force Microscopes share by Players (Top 3) 2021(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Atomic Force Microscopes share by Players (Top 5) 2021(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. Bruker (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. Bruker (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 18. Park Systems (South Korea) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Park Systems (South Korea) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 20. Oxford Instruments (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Oxford Instruments (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 22. Horiba (Japan) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Horiba (Japan) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 24. Hitachi High-Tech (Japan) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Hitachi High-Tech (Japan) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 26. Nanosurf (Switzerland) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Nanosurf (Switzerland) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 28. WITec (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. WITec (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 30. NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments (Russia) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments (Russia) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 32. NanoMagnetics Instruments (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. NanoMagnetics Instruments (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 34. Nanonics Imaging (Israel) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. Nanonics Imaging (Israel) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 36. AFM Workshop (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 37. AFM Workshop (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 38. Attocube Systems (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 39. Attocube Systems (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 40. Anton Paar (Austria) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 41. Anton Paar (Austria) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 42. Concept Scientific Instruments (France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 43. Concept Scientific Instruments (France) Revenue: by Geography 2021
  • Figure 44. Global Atomic Force Microscopes: by Type USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Figure 45. Global Atomic Force Microscopes: by Application USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Figure 46. Global Atomic Force Microscopes: by Grade USD Million (2022-2027)
  • Figure 47. South America Atomic Force Microscopes Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 48. Asia Pacific Atomic Force Microscopes Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 49. Europe Atomic Force Microscopes Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 50. MEA Atomic Force Microscopes Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 51. North America Atomic Force Microscopes Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Bruker (United States)
  • Park Systems (South Korea)
  • Oxford Instruments (United Kingdom)
  • Horiba (Japan)
  • Hitachi High-Tech (Japan)
  • Nanosurf (Switzerland)
  • WITec (Germany)
  • NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments (Russia)
  • NanoMagnetics Instruments (United Kingdom)
  • Nanonics Imaging (Israel)
  • AFM Workshop (United States)
  • Attocube Systems (Germany)
  • Anton Paar (Austria)
  • Concept Scientific Instruments (France)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Asylum Research (United States) , Hitachi High Technologies America (Japan) , Keysight Technologies (United States)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Aug 2022 154 Pages 65 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

Historical year: 2017-2021; Base year: 2021; Forecast period: 2022 to 2027
Companies that are profiled in Global Atomic Force Microscopes Market are Bruker (United States), Park Systems (South Korea), Oxford Instruments (United Kingdom), Horiba (Japan), Hitachi High-Tech (Japan), Nanosurf (Switzerland), WITec (Germany), NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments (Russia), NanoMagnetics Instruments (United Kingdom), Nanonics Imaging (Israel), AFM Workshop (United States), Attocube Systems (Germany), Anton Paar (Austria) and Concept Scientific Instruments (France) etc.
Material Science segment in Global market to hold robust market share owing to "Increasing demand in Rand D development of microscopes".
AMA Research predicts that United States Players will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Atomic Force Microscopes market throughout the forecasted period.

Know More About Global Atomic Force Microscopes Market Report?