Global Tracking-as-a-Service Market

Tracking-as-a-Service Comprehensive Study by Type (Platform-as-a-service (PaaS), Software-as-a-service (SaaS)), Application (Retail, Manufacturing, E-commerce, Consumer electronics, Transportation, Distribution & Delivery, Healthcare, Security, Others), Enterprise Size (Small and Medium Enterprise, Large Enterprise), Platform (Indoor, Outdoor) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Tracking-as-a-Service Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027  

Access Sample Report Make An Enquiry Before Purchase
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Industry Background:
Tracking-as-a-service can be outlined as a solution supported by the cloud wherever it helps industries to trace their day-to-day business processes. Industries like retail and producing deliver product daily, wherever the readying of a chase system is important so as to induce acknowledged regarding the delivery of a product or whether or not the inventory has to be updated, so as to stay on this track, industries use tracking-as-a-service for remote observation purposes.This growth is primarily driven by Growth in Use of Electronic Monitoring for Personal and Professional Work and Growing Demand for Order Tracking for Smoother Operation.

Globally, a noticeable market trend is evident Innovation in Technologies Like Employment of Robots in Warehouses and Increasing Adoption of Tracking-As-A-Service Solutions by Retail Sector . The Business Services sector in the North America region has been increasing at a sustainable rate and further growth is expected to be witnessed over the forecast period, owing to the robust investments and expansion in production facilities in the region. Major Players, such as DataLogic S.P.A (Italy), Impinj Inc. (United States), Infor Co. (United States), Midmark Co. (United States), Mojix Inc. (United States), PCCW Solutions (Hong Kong), Stanley Black and Decker, Inc (United States), Netreo Inc. (United States), Geotab (Canada) and Zebra Technologies Corp (United States) etc have either set up their manufacturing facilities or are planning to start new provision in the dominated region in the upcoming years.

Key Developments in the Market:
In 2021, Netreo Inc., an Information technology infrastructure and network monitoring company, acquired software-as-a-service application programming monitoring startup Stackify LLC. This acquisition will help collaborators Retrace service allowing users to identify issues in quality assurance and continuously improve and observe applications in production environments.
In 2020, Geotab, a global leader in IoT and connected transportation, and Eleos, a pioneer in software as a service (SaaS) for transportation partnered for UNIFY. This integrated solution offers a highly customizable open fleet management system with a comprehensive driver workflow platform and an FMCSA-compliant ELD with best-in-class solutions and rich data insights.

Market Drivers
  • Growth in Use of Electronic Monitoring for Personal and Professional Work
  • Growing Demand for Order Tracking for Smoother Operation

Market Trend
  • Innovation in Technologies Like Employment of Robots in Warehouses and Increasing Adoption of Tracking-As-A-Service Solutions by Retail Sector
  • Tracking Processes in Logistic Solutions and Compatibility to Inventory Management and Supply Chain Software

Restraints
  • Privacy Concerns Regarding Electronic Monitoring Hampers the Market Growth

Opportunities
The rise in Adoption of Internet-of-Things-Based Applications and Increase in Government Regulations to Boost GPS Tracking Across Vehicles
Challenges
Less Awareness about Service in Market

AMA Research follow a focused and realistic research framework that provides the ability to study the crucial market dynamics in several regions across the world. Moreover, an in-depth assessment is mostly conducted by our analysts on geographical regions to provide clients and businesses the opportunity to dominate in niche markets and expand in emerging markets across the globe. This market research study also showcase the spontaneously changing Players landscape impacting the growth of the market. Furthermore, our market researchers extensively analyse the products and services offered by multiple players competing to increase their market share and presence.

Customization in the Report
AMA Research features not only specific market forecasts, but also include significant value-added commentary on:
- Market Trends
- Technological Trends and Innovations
- Market Maturity Indicators
- Growth Drivers and Constraints
- New Entrants into the Market & Entry/Exit Barriers
- To Seize Powerful Market Opportunities
- Identify Key Business Segments, Market Proposition & Gap Analysis

Against this Challenging Backdrop, Tracking-as-a-Service Study Sheds Light on
— The Tracking-as-a-Service Market status quo and key characteristics. To end this, Analyst at AMA organize and took survey of the Tracking-as-a-Service industry Players. The resultant snapshot serves as a basis for understanding why and how the industry can be expected to change.
— Where Tracking-as-a-Service industry is heading and what are the top priorities. Insights are drawn from financial analysis, the survey and interviews with key executives and industry experts.
— How every company in this diverse set of Players can best navigate the emerging competition landscape and follow a strategy that helps them position to hold value they currently claim, or capture the new addressable opportunity.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Platform-as-a-service (PaaS)
  • Software-as-a-service (SaaS)
By Application
  • Retail
  • Manufacturing
  • E-commerce
  • Consumer electronics
  • Transportation
  • Distribution & Delivery
  • Healthcare
  • Security
  • Others
By Enterprise Size
  • Small and Medium Enterprise
  • Large Enterprise

By Platform
  • Indoor
  • Outdoor

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Growth in Use of Electronic Monitoring for Personal and Professional Work
      • 3.2.2. Growing Demand for Order Tracking for Smoother Operation
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Less Awareness about Service in Market
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Innovation in Technologies Like Employment of Robots in Warehouses and Increasing Adoption of Tracking-As-A-Service Solutions by Retail Sector
      • 3.4.2. Tracking Processes in Logistic Solutions and Compatibility to Inventory Management and Supply Chain Software
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type, Application, Enterprise Size, Platform and Region (value) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Tracking-as-a-Service (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Tracking-as-a-Service by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Platform-as-a-service (PaaS)
        • 5.2.1.2. Software-as-a-service (SaaS)
      • 5.2.2. Global Tracking-as-a-Service by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Retail
        • 5.2.2.2. Manufacturing
        • 5.2.2.3. E-commerce
        • 5.2.2.4. Consumer electronics
        • 5.2.2.5. Transportation
        • 5.2.2.6. Distribution & Delivery
        • 5.2.2.7. Healthcare
        • 5.2.2.8. Security
        • 5.2.2.9. Others
      • 5.2.3. Global Tracking-as-a-Service by: Enterprise Size (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Small and Medium Enterprise
        • 5.2.3.2. Large Enterprise
      • 5.2.4. Global Tracking-as-a-Service by: Platform (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Indoor
        • 5.2.4.2. Outdoor
      • 5.2.5. Global Tracking-as-a-Service Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Tracking-as-a-Service: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. DataLogic S.P.A (Italy)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Impinj Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Infor Co. (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Midmark Co. (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Mojix Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. PCCW Solutions (Hong Kong)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Stanley Black and Decker, Inc (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Netreo Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Geotab (Canada)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Zebra Technologies Corp (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Tracking-as-a-Service Sale, by Type, Application, Enterprise Size, Platform and Region (value) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Tracking-as-a-Service (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Tracking-as-a-Service by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Platform-as-a-service (PaaS)
        • 7.2.1.2. Software-as-a-service (SaaS)
      • 7.2.2. Global Tracking-as-a-Service by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Retail
        • 7.2.2.2. Manufacturing
        • 7.2.2.3. E-commerce
        • 7.2.2.4. Consumer electronics
        • 7.2.2.5. Transportation
        • 7.2.2.6. Distribution & Delivery
        • 7.2.2.7. Healthcare
        • 7.2.2.8. Security
        • 7.2.2.9. Others
      • 7.2.3. Global Tracking-as-a-Service by: Enterprise Size (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Small and Medium Enterprise
        • 7.2.3.2. Large Enterprise
      • 7.2.4. Global Tracking-as-a-Service by: Platform (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Indoor
        • 7.2.4.2. Outdoor
      • 7.2.5. Global Tracking-as-a-Service Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Tracking-as-a-Service: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Tracking-as-a-Service Platform-as-a-service (PaaS) , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Tracking-as-a-Service Software-as-a-service (SaaS) , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Tracking-as-a-Service: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 5. Tracking-as-a-Service Retail , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Tracking-as-a-Service Manufacturing , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 7. Tracking-as-a-Service E-commerce , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 8. Tracking-as-a-Service Consumer electronics , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Tracking-as-a-Service Transportation , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Tracking-as-a-Service Distribution & Delivery , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Tracking-as-a-Service Healthcare , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 12. Tracking-as-a-Service Security , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Tracking-as-a-Service Others , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. Tracking-as-a-Service: by Enterprise Size(USD Million)
  • Table 15. Tracking-as-a-Service Small and Medium Enterprise , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. Tracking-as-a-Service Large Enterprise , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. Tracking-as-a-Service: by Platform(USD Million)
  • Table 18. Tracking-as-a-Service Indoor , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Tracking-as-a-Service Outdoor , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Brazil Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. Brazil Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Brazil Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Brazil Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. Argentina Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Argentina Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. Argentina Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. Argentina Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. Rest of South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Rest of South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Rest of South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Rest of South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. China Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. China Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. China Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. China Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. Japan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. Japan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. Japan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Japan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. India Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. India Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. India Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. India Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. South Korea Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. South Korea Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. South Korea Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. South Korea Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. Taiwan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. Taiwan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. Taiwan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. Taiwan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. Australia Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. Australia Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Australia Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. Australia Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. Germany Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. Germany Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. Germany Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Germany Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. France Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. France Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. France Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. France Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. Italy Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. Italy Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. Italy Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. Italy Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. United Kingdom Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. United Kingdom Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. United Kingdom Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. United Kingdom Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. Netherlands Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Netherlands Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Netherlands Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Netherlands Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Rest of Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Rest of Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Rest of Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 98. Rest of Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 99. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 100. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 101. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 102. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 103. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 104. Middle East Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 105. Middle East Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 106. Middle East Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 107. Middle East Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 108. Africa Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 109. Africa Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 110. Africa Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 111. Africa Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 112. North America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 113. North America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 114. North America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 115. North America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 116. North America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 117. United States Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 118. United States Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 119. United States Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 120. United States Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 121. Canada Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 122. Canada Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 123. Canada Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 124. Canada Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 125. Mexico Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 126. Mexico Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 127. Mexico Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 128. Mexico Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 129. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 130. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 131. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 132. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 133. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 134. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 135. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 136. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 137. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 138. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 139. Tracking-as-a-Service: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 140. Tracking-as-a-Service Platform-as-a-service (PaaS) , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 141. Tracking-as-a-Service Software-as-a-service (SaaS) , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 142. Tracking-as-a-Service: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 143. Tracking-as-a-Service Retail , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 144. Tracking-as-a-Service Manufacturing , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 145. Tracking-as-a-Service E-commerce , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 146. Tracking-as-a-Service Consumer electronics , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. Tracking-as-a-Service Transportation , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 148. Tracking-as-a-Service Distribution & Delivery , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. Tracking-as-a-Service Healthcare , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 150. Tracking-as-a-Service Security , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. Tracking-as-a-Service Others , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Tracking-as-a-Service: by Enterprise Size(USD Million)
  • Table 153. Tracking-as-a-Service Small and Medium Enterprise , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 154. Tracking-as-a-Service Large Enterprise , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. Tracking-as-a-Service: by Platform(USD Million)
  • Table 156. Tracking-as-a-Service Indoor , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. Tracking-as-a-Service Outdoor , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. Brazil Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Brazil Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. Brazil Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. Brazil Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. Argentina Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. Argentina Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. Argentina Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Argentina Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Rest of South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. Rest of South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. Rest of South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. Rest of South America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. China Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. China Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. China Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. China Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. Japan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Japan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Japan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. Japan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. India Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. India Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. India Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. India Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. South Korea Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. South Korea Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. South Korea Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. South Korea Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. Taiwan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. Taiwan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. Taiwan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. Taiwan Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. Australia Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. Australia Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. Australia Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Australia Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 205. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 206. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 207. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 208. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 209. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 210. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 211. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 212. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 213. Germany Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 214. Germany Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 215. Germany Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 216. Germany Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 217. France Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 218. France Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 219. France Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 220. France Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 221. Italy Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 222. Italy Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 223. Italy Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 224. Italy Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 225. United Kingdom Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 226. United Kingdom Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 227. United Kingdom Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 228. United Kingdom Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 229. Netherlands Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 230. Netherlands Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 231. Netherlands Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 232. Netherlands Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 233. Rest of Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 234. Rest of Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 235. Rest of Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 236. Rest of Europe Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 237. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 238. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 239. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 240. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 241. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 242. Middle East Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 243. Middle East Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 244. Middle East Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 245. Middle East Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 246. Africa Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 247. Africa Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 248. Africa Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 249. Africa Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 250. North America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 251. North America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 252. North America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 253. North America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 254. North America Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 255. United States Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 256. United States Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 257. United States Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 258. United States Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 259. Canada Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 260. Canada Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 261. Canada Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 262. Canada Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 263. Mexico Tracking-as-a-Service, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 264. Mexico Tracking-as-a-Service, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 265. Mexico Tracking-as-a-Service, by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 266. Mexico Tracking-as-a-Service, by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 267. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 268. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 269. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Tracking-as-a-Service: by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Tracking-as-a-Service: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Tracking-as-a-Service: by Enterprise Size USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. Global Tracking-as-a-Service: by Platform USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 8. South America Tracking-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Tracking-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Tracking-as-a-Service share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 14. Global Tracking-as-a-Service share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 15. Global Tracking-as-a-Service share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 16. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 17. DataLogic S.P.A (Italy) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 18. DataLogic S.P.A (Italy) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 19. Impinj Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 20. Impinj Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 21. Infor Co. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 22. Infor Co. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 23. Midmark Co. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 24. Midmark Co. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 25. Mojix Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 26. Mojix Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 27. PCCW Solutions (Hong Kong) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 28. PCCW Solutions (Hong Kong) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 29. Stanley Black and Decker, Inc (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 30. Stanley Black and Decker, Inc (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 31. Netreo Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 32. Netreo Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 33. Geotab (Canada) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 34. Geotab (Canada) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 35. Zebra Technologies Corp (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 36. Zebra Technologies Corp (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 37. Global Tracking-as-a-Service: by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 38. Global Tracking-as-a-Service: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 39. Global Tracking-as-a-Service: by Enterprise Size USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 40. Global Tracking-as-a-Service: by Platform USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 41. South America Tracking-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. Asia Pacific Tracking-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. Europe Tracking-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 44. MEA Tracking-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 45. North America Tracking-as-a-Service Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • DataLogic S.P.A (Italy)
  • Impinj Inc. (United States)
  • Infor Co. (United States)
  • Midmark Co. (United States)
  • Mojix Inc. (United States)
  • PCCW Solutions (Hong Kong)
  • Stanley Black and Decker, Inc (United States)
  • Netreo Inc. (United States)
  • Geotab (Canada)
  • Zebra Technologies Corp (United States)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Topcon Co. (Japan) , Trimble Inc. (United States)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Jul 2021 203 Pages 58 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now
Global Tracking-as-a-Service Market Quantitative research analysis
Global Tracking-as-a-Service Market Qualitative Industry Analysis
DOWNLOAD SAMPLE PDF

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

The Tracking-as-a-Service market is expected to see a CAGR of % during projected year 2020 to 2026.
Top performing companies in the Global Tracking-as-a-Service market are DataLogic S.P.A (Italy), Impinj Inc. (United States), Infor Co. (United States), Midmark Co. (United States), Mojix Inc. (United States), PCCW Solutions (Hong Kong), Stanley Black and Decker, Inc (United States), Netreo Inc. (United States), Geotab (Canada) and Zebra Technologies Corp (United States), to name a few.
North America is dominating the Tracking-as-a-Service Market.

Know More About Global Tracking-as-a-Service Market Report?

Have a Query? Click Here

Other Related Reports

Event Management as a Service Comprehensive Study by Type (Pre Event Services, Onsite Services, Post Event Services), Application (Private Events, Sports, Entertainment, Business & Organisations, Oth...
$ 3750
Digital Printing Packaging Comprehensive Study by Format (Large format printing, Full color printing, Variable data printing, Others), Printing Inks (Solvent-based, UV-based, Dye sublimation inks, Ot...
$ 3800
Mobile Edge Computing Comprehensive Study by Type (Hardware, Software, Service), Application (Location-Based Services, Video Surveillance, Unified Communication, Environmental Monitoring, Optimized L...
$ 3750
Mobile Ad Spending Comprehensive Study by Type (Search ads, Display ads, SMS ads, Banner Ad, Interstitial, Offer-Wall, Video Ad, Native Ad, Social Ad, Gamified), Application (Smart phones, Tablet dev...
$ 3750
E-Commerce Comprehensive Study by Type (B2B (Business to Business), B2C (Business to Consumer), C2C (Consumer to Consumer)), Application (Supply Chain Management, Inventory Management, Procurement an...
$ 3750
Residue Testing Comprehensive Study by Type (Allergens, Pesticides, Others), Application (Fruits and Vegetables, Dairy Products, Meat and Poultry, Cereals, Grains & Pulses, Processed Food, Others), T...
$ 3650