Global Cloud-native Application Protection Market

Cloud-native Application Protection Comprehensive Study by End-user Industry (Healthcare, E-Commerce and Retail, Government and Public Sector, Telecommunications, Media and Entertainment, Manufacturing and Industrial IoT, Energy and Utilities, Bank, Others), Deployment Model (Public Cloud, Private Cloud, Hybrid Cloud) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2032

Cloud-native Application Protection Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2025-2032  

Access Sample Report Make An Enquiry Before Purchase
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
About Cloud-native Application Protection
Cloud-native Application Protection (CNAP) refers to a group of security practices, tools, and strategies designed to protect applications developed to run in the cloud environment. CNAP aims to protect applications throughout their lifecycle, from design, development, testing, deployment, and runtime, as opposed to traditional security models in which perimeter defenses form the basis of serving the needs of security. Cloud-native applications, commonly modeled with microservices and container and serverless architectures, are subject to unique security challenges in that respect. To meet this, CNAP features integrated security measures throughout all stages: development, testing configuration, deployment, and runtime. Continuous monitoring provides a major tenet of CNAP and enables the detection of vulnerabilities and misconfigurations as they occur. The latter allows for timely identification and subsequent mitigation of security threats before exploits occur. Apart from this, CNAP also involves the application of automated tools to guarantee security policy enforcement—such as identity and access management (IAM) and sensitive data encryption—in line with security standards. It also underpins the infrastructure on which the application sits, including container orchestration applications like Kubernetes. Security integrated into the development pipeline by CNAP implies that security is no longer an afterthought but now forms a core aspect of the application's architecture.

AttributesDetails
Study Period2020-2032
Base Year2024
UnitValue (USD Million)


The companies are exploring the market by adopting mergers & acquisitions, expansions, investments, new service launches and collaborations as their preferred strategies. The players are exploring new geographies through expansions and acquisitions to avail a competitive advantage through combined synergies. Established and emerging Players should take a closer view at their existing organizations and reinvent traditional business and operating models to adapt to the future.

Aqua Security (Israel), Cequence Security (US), Check Point Software Technologies (Israel), CrowdStrike (US), Data Theorem (US), Forcepoint (US), Fortinet (US), Palo Alto Networks (US), Proofpoint (US), Radware (Israel), Runecast (UK), Sophos (UK), Trend Micro (Japan) and Zscaler (US) are some of the key players that are part of study coverage.

Segmentation Overview
AMA Research has segmented the market of Global Cloud-native Application Protection market by and Region.



On the basis of geography, the market of Cloud-native Application Protection has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). If we see Market by End-user Industry, the sub-segment i.e. Healthcare will boost the Cloud-native Application Protection market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Deployment Model, the sub-segment i.e. Public Cloud will boost the Cloud-native Application Protection market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

Influencing Trend:
Driving the demand for cloud-native security solutions. and Growing adoption of managed security services for cloud applications.

Market Growth Drivers:
Growing threat landscape is driving the need for advanced security measures. and Leading to growth in container security products.

Challenges:
Organizations are moving their applications to the cloud, creating new security challenges.

Restraints:
Securing cloud applications can be challenging due to the distributed nature of the infrastructure. and Skilled security professionals are in high demand.

Opportunities:
Opportunity for CNAP solutions to address these emerging threats with tools for threat detection, incident response, and real-time monitoring.

Market Leaders and their expansionary development strategies
In February 2024, SentinelOne, a global leader in AI-powered security, that it has completed its acquisition of cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) PingSafe, ushering in a new era of cloud security which it is in pole position to lead.
In April 2024, Aqua Security, the pioneer in cloud native security, announced the general availability (GA) of the Aqua Cloud Security Platform, SaaS version, serving the Australia region. Customers can immediately take advantage of the data sovereignty, platform security and flexibility provided by the SaaS service to prevent cloud native attacks before they happen and stop them as they happen.


Key Target Audience
Venture Capitalists and Private Equity Firms, New Entrants/Investors, Strategic Business Planners, Government Regulatory, Research Organizations, End-Use Industries and Others

About Approach
To evaluate and validate the market size various sources including primary and secondary analysis is utilized. AMA Research follows regulatory standards such as NAICS/SIC/ICB/TRCB, to have a better understanding of the market. The market study is conducted on basis of more than 200 companies dealing in the market regional as well as global areas with the purpose to understand the companies positioning regarding the market value, volume, and their market share for regional as well as global.

Further to bring relevance specific to any niche market we set and apply a number of criteria like Geographic Footprints, Regional Segments of Revenue, Operational Centres, etc. The next step is to finalize a team (In-House + Data Agencies) who then starts collecting C & D level executives and profiles, Industry experts, Opinion leaders, etc., and work towards appointment generation.

The primary research is performed by taking the interviews of executives of various companies dealing in the market as well as using the survey reports, research institute, and latest research reports. Meanwhile, the analyst team keeps preparing a set of questionnaires, and after getting the appointee list; the target audience is then tapped and segregated with various mediums and channels that are feasible for making connections that including email communication, telephonic, skype, LinkedIn Group & InMail, Community Forums, Community Forums, open Survey, SurveyMonkey, etc.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By End-user Industry
  • Healthcare
  • E-Commerce and Retail
  • Government and Public Sector
  • Telecommunications
  • Media and Entertainment
  • Manufacturing and Industrial IoT
  • Energy and Utilities
  • Bank
  • Others

By Deployment Model
  • Public Cloud
  • Private Cloud
  • Hybrid Cloud

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Growing threat landscape is driving the need for advanced security measures.
      • 3.2.2. Leading to growth in container security products.
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Organizations are moving their applications to the cloud, creating new security challenges.
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Driving the demand for cloud-native security solutions.
      • 3.4.2. Growing adoption of managed security services for cloud applications.
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry, Deployment Model and Region (value) (2019-2024)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Cloud-native Application Protection (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Cloud-native Application Protection by: End-user Industry (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Healthcare
        • 5.2.1.2. E-Commerce and Retail
        • 5.2.1.3. Government and Public Sector
        • 5.2.1.4. Telecommunications
        • 5.2.1.5. Media and Entertainment
        • 5.2.1.6. Manufacturing and Industrial IoT
        • 5.2.1.7. Energy and Utilities
        • 5.2.1.8. Bank
        • 5.2.1.9. Others
      • 5.2.2. Global Cloud-native Application Protection by: Deployment Model (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Public Cloud
        • 5.2.2.2. Private Cloud
        • 5.2.2.3. Hybrid Cloud
      • 5.2.3. Global Cloud-native Application Protection Region
        • 5.2.3.1. South America
          • 5.2.3.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.3.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.3.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.3.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.3.2.1. China
          • 5.2.3.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.3.2.3. India
          • 5.2.3.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.3.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.3.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.3.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.3.3. Europe
          • 5.2.3.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.3.3.2. France
          • 5.2.3.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.3.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.3.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.3.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.3.4. MEA
          • 5.2.3.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.3.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.3.5. North America
          • 5.2.3.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.3.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.3.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Cloud-native Application Protection: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2024)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Aqua Security (Israel)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Cequence Security (US)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Check Point Software Technologies (Israel)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. CrowdStrike (US)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Data Theorem (US)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Forcepoint (US)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Fortinet (US)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Palo Alto Networks (US)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Proofpoint (US)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Radware (Israel)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.11. Runecast (UK)
        • 6.4.11.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.11.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.11.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.11.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.12. Sophos (UK)
        • 6.4.12.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.12.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.12.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.12.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.13. Trend Micro (Japan)
        • 6.4.13.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.13.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.13.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.13.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.14. Zscaler (US)
        • 6.4.14.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.14.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.14.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.14.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Cloud-native Application Protection Sale, by End-user Industry, Deployment Model and Region (value) (2027-2032)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Cloud-native Application Protection (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Cloud-native Application Protection by: End-user Industry (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Healthcare
        • 7.2.1.2. E-Commerce and Retail
        • 7.2.1.3. Government and Public Sector
        • 7.2.1.4. Telecommunications
        • 7.2.1.5. Media and Entertainment
        • 7.2.1.6. Manufacturing and Industrial IoT
        • 7.2.1.7. Energy and Utilities
        • 7.2.1.8. Bank
        • 7.2.1.9. Others
      • 7.2.2. Global Cloud-native Application Protection by: Deployment Model (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Public Cloud
        • 7.2.2.2. Private Cloud
        • 7.2.2.3. Hybrid Cloud
      • 7.2.3. Global Cloud-native Application Protection Region
        • 7.2.3.1. South America
          • 7.2.3.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.3.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.3.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.3.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.3.2.1. China
          • 7.2.3.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.3.2.3. India
          • 7.2.3.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.3.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.3.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.3.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.3.3. Europe
          • 7.2.3.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.3.3.2. France
          • 7.2.3.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.3.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.3.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.3.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.3.4. MEA
          • 7.2.3.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.3.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.3.5. North America
          • 7.2.3.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.3.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.3.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Cloud-native Application Protection: by End-user Industry(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Cloud-native Application Protection Healthcare , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 3. Cloud-native Application Protection E-Commerce and Retail , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 4. Cloud-native Application Protection Government and Public Sector , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 5. Cloud-native Application Protection Telecommunications , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 6. Cloud-native Application Protection Media and Entertainment , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 7. Cloud-native Application Protection Manufacturing and Industrial IoT , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 8. Cloud-native Application Protection Energy and Utilities , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 9. Cloud-native Application Protection Bank , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 10. Cloud-native Application Protection Others , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 11. Cloud-native Application Protection: by Deployment Model(USD Million)
  • Table 12. Cloud-native Application Protection Public Cloud , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 13. Cloud-native Application Protection Private Cloud , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 14. Cloud-native Application Protection Hybrid Cloud , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 15. South America Cloud-native Application Protection, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 16. South America Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 17. South America Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 18. Brazil Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 19. Brazil Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 20. Argentina Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 21. Argentina Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 22. Rest of South America Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 23. Rest of South America Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 24. Asia Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 25. Asia Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 26. Asia Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 27. China Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 28. China Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 29. Japan Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 30. Japan Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 31. India Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 32. India Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 33. South Korea Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 34. South Korea Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 35. Taiwan Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 36. Taiwan Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 37. Australia Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 38. Australia Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 39. Rest of Asia-Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 40. Rest of Asia-Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 41. Europe Cloud-native Application Protection, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 42. Europe Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 43. Europe Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 44. Germany Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 45. Germany Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 46. France Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 47. France Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 48. Italy Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 49. Italy Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 50. United Kingdom Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 51. United Kingdom Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 52. Netherlands Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 53. Netherlands Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 54. Rest of Europe Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 55. Rest of Europe Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 56. MEA Cloud-native Application Protection, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 57. MEA Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 58. MEA Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 59. Middle East Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 60. Middle East Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 61. Africa Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 62. Africa Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 63. North America Cloud-native Application Protection, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 64. North America Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 65. North America Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 66. United States Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 67. United States Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 68. Canada Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 69. Canada Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 70. Mexico Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 71. Mexico Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 72. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 73. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 74. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 75. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 76. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 77. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 78. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 79. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 80. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 81. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 82. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 83. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 84. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 85. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 86. Cloud-native Application Protection: by End-user Industry(USD Million)
  • Table 87. Cloud-native Application Protection Healthcare , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 88. Cloud-native Application Protection E-Commerce and Retail , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 89. Cloud-native Application Protection Government and Public Sector , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 90. Cloud-native Application Protection Telecommunications , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 91. Cloud-native Application Protection Media and Entertainment , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 92. Cloud-native Application Protection Manufacturing and Industrial IoT , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 93. Cloud-native Application Protection Energy and Utilities , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 94. Cloud-native Application Protection Bank , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 95. Cloud-native Application Protection Others , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 96. Cloud-native Application Protection: by Deployment Model(USD Million)
  • Table 97. Cloud-native Application Protection Public Cloud , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 98. Cloud-native Application Protection Private Cloud , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 99. Cloud-native Application Protection Hybrid Cloud , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 100. South America Cloud-native Application Protection, by Country USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 101. South America Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 102. South America Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 103. Brazil Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 104. Brazil Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 105. Argentina Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 106. Argentina Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 107. Rest of South America Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 108. Rest of South America Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 109. Asia Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection, by Country USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 110. Asia Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 111. Asia Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 112. China Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 113. China Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 114. Japan Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 115. Japan Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 116. India Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 117. India Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 118. South Korea Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 119. South Korea Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 120. Taiwan Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 121. Taiwan Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 122. Australia Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 123. Australia Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 124. Rest of Asia-Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 125. Rest of Asia-Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 126. Europe Cloud-native Application Protection, by Country USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 127. Europe Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 128. Europe Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 129. Germany Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 130. Germany Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 131. France Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 132. France Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 133. Italy Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 134. Italy Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 135. United Kingdom Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 136. United Kingdom Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 137. Netherlands Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 138. Netherlands Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 139. Rest of Europe Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 140. Rest of Europe Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 141. MEA Cloud-native Application Protection, by Country USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 142. MEA Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 143. MEA Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 144. Middle East Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 145. Middle East Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 146. Africa Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 147. Africa Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 148. North America Cloud-native Application Protection, by Country USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 149. North America Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 150. North America Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 151. United States Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 152. United States Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 153. Canada Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 154. Canada Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 155. Mexico Cloud-native Application Protection, by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 156. Mexico Cloud-native Application Protection, by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 157. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 158. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 159. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Cloud-native Application Protection: by End-user Industry USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 5. Global Cloud-native Application Protection: by Deployment Model USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 6. South America Cloud-native Application Protection Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 7. Asia Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Europe Cloud-native Application Protection Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. MEA Cloud-native Application Protection Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. North America Cloud-native Application Protection Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. Global Cloud-native Application Protection share by Players 2024 (%)
  • Figure 12. Global Cloud-native Application Protection share by Players (Top 3) 2024(%)
  • Figure 13. Global Cloud-native Application Protection share by Players (Top 5) 2024(%)
  • Figure 14. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 15. Aqua Security (Israel) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 16. Aqua Security (Israel) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 17. Cequence Security (US) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 18. Cequence Security (US) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 19. Check Point Software Technologies (Israel) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 20. Check Point Software Technologies (Israel) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 21. CrowdStrike (US) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 22. CrowdStrike (US) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 23. Data Theorem (US) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 24. Data Theorem (US) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 25. Forcepoint (US) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 26. Forcepoint (US) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 27. Fortinet (US) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 28. Fortinet (US) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 29. Palo Alto Networks (US) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 30. Palo Alto Networks (US) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 31. Proofpoint (US) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 32. Proofpoint (US) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 33. Radware (Israel) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 34. Radware (Israel) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 35. Runecast (UK) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 36. Runecast (UK) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 37. Sophos (UK) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 38. Sophos (UK) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 39. Trend Micro (Japan) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 40. Trend Micro (Japan) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 41. Zscaler (US) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 42. Zscaler (US) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 43. Global Cloud-native Application Protection: by End-user Industry USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Figure 44. Global Cloud-native Application Protection: by Deployment Model USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Figure 45. South America Cloud-native Application Protection Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 46. Asia Pacific Cloud-native Application Protection Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 47. Europe Cloud-native Application Protection Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 48. MEA Cloud-native Application Protection Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 49. North America Cloud-native Application Protection Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Aqua Security (Israel)
  • Cequence Security (US)
  • Check Point Software Technologies (Israel)
  • CrowdStrike (US)
  • Data Theorem (US)
  • Forcepoint (US)
  • Fortinet (US)
  • Palo Alto Networks (US)
  • Proofpoint (US)
  • Radware (Israel)
  • Runecast (UK)
  • Sophos (UK)
  • Trend Micro (Japan)
  • Zscaler (US)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Jan 2025 242 Pages 72 Tables Base Year: 2024 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now
Global Cloud-native Application Protection Market Quantitative research analysis
Global Cloud-native Application Protection Market Qualitative Industry Analysis
DOWNLOAD SAMPLE PDF

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

The standard version of the report profiles players such as Aqua Security (Israel), Cequence Security (US), Check Point Software Technologies (Israel), CrowdStrike (US), Data Theorem (US), Forcepoint (US), Fortinet (US), Palo Alto Networks (US), Proofpoint (US), Radware (Israel), Runecast (UK), Sophos (UK), Trend Micro (Japan) and Zscaler (US) etc.
The Study can be customized subject to feasibility and data availability. Please connect with our sales representative for further information.
"Driving the demand for cloud-native security solutions. " is seen as one of major influencing trends for Cloud-native Application Protection Market during projected period 2024-2032.
The Cloud-native Application Protection market study includes a random mix of players, including both market leaders and some top growing emerging players. Connect with our sales executive to get a complete company list in our research coverage.

Know More About Global Cloud-native Application Protection Market Report?

Have a Query? Click Here

Other Related Reports

Multi Pad Drilling- Comprehensive Study by Type (Mobile Rigs, Land Rigs, Offshore Rigs), Application (Oil and Gas Exploration, Geothermal Exploration, Water Well Drilling, Mining) Players and Region ...
$ 3800