Global Tracking as a Service

Tracking as a Service Comprehensive Study by Type (Platform-as-a-service, Software-as-a-service), End User (Retail, Manufacturing, E-commerce, Consumer electronics, Transportation, Distribution & Delivery, Healthcare, Security, Others), Location (Indoor, Outdoor) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2028

Tracking as a Service Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2023-2028  

Access Sample Report Make An Enquiry Before Purchase
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Tracking as a Service Market Scope
Tracking-as-a-service can be defined a solution based on the cloud where it helps industries to track their day-to-day business processes. It used in the supply chain and logistics industry to track inventories, vehicles, and assets. The platform is used by enterprises in retail and manufacturing industries, where goods are delivered regularly, and deployment of a tracking system is necessary for remote monitoring. Cloud-based tracking systems are gaining popularity because the data can be transmitted instantly in a cloud-based ICT infrastructure. Also, the growing use of electronic monitoring for personal and professional work is anticipated to boost the market growth of tracking-as-a-service.



The companies operating in this industry are focusing more on efficient growth, improvement of operational efficiency and productivity, achieving high safety standards, and focus on maintaining sustainable development. The players are focusing on securing a leading position in this industry. They are continuously looking for the opportunity to reinforce their competitive advantage. To meet a high market share, and developing a socially responsible business company is identifying various strategic pillars such as mergers & acquisitions, new product launch, product enhancement, and others. Research Analyst at AMA estimates that United States Players will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Tracking as a Service market throughout the predicted period.

Motorola Solutions (United States), Wabco (United States), AT&T (United States), Zebra Technologies (United States), Verizon (United States), Geotab (Canada), Blackline Safety (Canada), Spidertracks (New Zealand), Honeywell (United States) and Trimble (United States) are some of the key players that are part of study coverage.

Segmentation Overview
The study have segmented the market of Global Tracking as a Service market by Type (Platform-as-a-service and Software-as-a-service) and Region with country level break-up.

On the basis of geography, the market of Tracking as a Service has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico).

Influencing Trend:
Emergence of Eye Tracking Systems

Market Growth Drivers:
Upsurging Use of Mobile Technology and Need To Improve Fleet Operator Efficiency

Challenges:
Limited Control Given To Customers

Restraints:
Privacy Concerns Regarding Electronic Monitoring System

Opportunities:
Use of Electronic Monitoring Systems for Offender Monitoring, Automation in the Retail Industry and Increasing Adoption of IoT

Market Leaders and their Expansionary Development Strategies
In 2019, Verizon Connect recently partnered with Iveco, a leading manufacturer of commercial and industrial vehicles, to help customers gain insights into their fleets and to provide customers with a comprehensive telematics and mobile workforce management software platform.
In 2019, WABCO announced that it would launch its new advanced trailer monitoring and remote diagnostics solution, TX-TRAILERPULSE, a trailer-focused IoT connectivity solution which combines real-time track and trace functionality with additional remote trailer health and diagnostic information.


Key Target Audience
Venture Capitalists and Private Equity Firms, New Entrants/Investors, Analyst and Strategic Business Planners, Tracking as Service Providers, Government Regulatory and Research Organizations and End-Use Industries

About Approach
The research aims to propose a patent-based approach in searching for potential technology partners as a supporting tool for enabling open innovation. The study also proposes a systematic searching process of technology partners as a
preliminary step to select the emerging and key players that are involved in implementing market estimations. While patent analysis is employed to overcome the aforementioned data- and process-related limitations, as expenses occurred in that technology allows us to estimate the market size by evolving segments as target market from the total available market.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Platform-as-a-service
  • Software-as-a-service
By End User
  • Retail
  • Manufacturing
  • E-commerce
  • Consumer electronics
  • Transportation
  • Distribution & Delivery
  • Healthcare
  • Security
  • Others

By Location
  • Indoor
  • Outdoor

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Upsurging Use of Mobile Technology
      • 3.2.2. Need To Improve Fleet Operator Efficiency
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Limited Control Given To Customers
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Emergence of Eye Tracking Systems
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Tracking as a Service, by Type, End User, Location and Region (value) (2017-2022)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Tracking as a Service (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Tracking as a Service by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Platform-as-a-service
        • 5.2.1.2. Software-as-a-service
      • 5.2.2. Global Tracking as a Service by: End User (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Retail
        • 5.2.2.2. Manufacturing
        • 5.2.2.3. E-commerce
        • 5.2.2.4. Consumer electronics
        • 5.2.2.5. Transportation
        • 5.2.2.6. Distribution & Delivery
        • 5.2.2.7. Healthcare
        • 5.2.2.8. Security
        • 5.2.2.9. Others
      • 5.2.3. Global Tracking as a Service by: Location (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Indoor
        • 5.2.3.2. Outdoor
      • 5.2.4. Global Tracking as a Service Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Tracking as a Service: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2022)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Motorola Solutions (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Wabco (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. AT&T (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Zebra Technologies (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Verizon (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Geotab (Canada)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Blackline Safety (Canada)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Spidertracks (New Zealand)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Honeywell (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Trimble (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Tracking as a Service Sale, by Type, End User, Location and Region (value) (2023-2028)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Tracking as a Service (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Tracking as a Service by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Platform-as-a-service
        • 7.2.1.2. Software-as-a-service
      • 7.2.2. Global Tracking as a Service by: End User (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Retail
        • 7.2.2.2. Manufacturing
        • 7.2.2.3. E-commerce
        • 7.2.2.4. Consumer electronics
        • 7.2.2.5. Transportation
        • 7.2.2.6. Distribution & Delivery
        • 7.2.2.7. Healthcare
        • 7.2.2.8. Security
        • 7.2.2.9. Others
      • 7.2.3. Global Tracking as a Service by: Location (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Indoor
        • 7.2.3.2. Outdoor
      • 7.2.4. Global Tracking as a Service Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Tracking as a Service: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Tracking as a Service Platform-as-a-service , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 3. Tracking as a Service Software-as-a-service , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 4. Tracking as a Service: by End User(USD Million)
  • Table 5. Tracking as a Service Retail , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 6. Tracking as a Service Manufacturing , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 7. Tracking as a Service E-commerce , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 8. Tracking as a Service Consumer electronics , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 9. Tracking as a Service Transportation , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 10. Tracking as a Service Distribution & Delivery , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 11. Tracking as a Service Healthcare , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 12. Tracking as a Service Security , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 13. Tracking as a Service Others , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 14. Tracking as a Service: by Location(USD Million)
  • Table 15. Tracking as a Service Indoor , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 16. Tracking as a Service Outdoor , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 17. South America Tracking as a Service, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 18. South America Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 19. South America Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 20. South America Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 21. Brazil Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 22. Brazil Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 23. Brazil Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 24. Argentina Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 25. Argentina Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 26. Argentina Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 27. Rest of South America Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 28. Rest of South America Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 29. Rest of South America Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 30. Asia Pacific Tracking as a Service, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 31. Asia Pacific Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 32. Asia Pacific Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 33. Asia Pacific Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 34. China Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 35. China Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 36. China Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 37. Japan Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 38. Japan Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 39. Japan Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 40. India Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 41. India Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 42. India Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 43. South Korea Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 44. South Korea Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 45. South Korea Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 46. Taiwan Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 47. Taiwan Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 48. Taiwan Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 49. Australia Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 50. Australia Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 51. Australia Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 52. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 53. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 54. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 55. Europe Tracking as a Service, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 56. Europe Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 57. Europe Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 58. Europe Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 59. Germany Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 60. Germany Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 61. Germany Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 62. France Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 63. France Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 64. France Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 65. Italy Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 66. Italy Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 67. Italy Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 68. United Kingdom Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 69. United Kingdom Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 70. United Kingdom Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 71. Netherlands Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 72. Netherlands Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 73. Netherlands Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 74. Rest of Europe Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 75. Rest of Europe Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 76. Rest of Europe Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 77. MEA Tracking as a Service, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 78. MEA Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 79. MEA Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 80. MEA Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 81. Middle East Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 82. Middle East Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 83. Middle East Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 84. Africa Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 85. Africa Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 86. Africa Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 87. North America Tracking as a Service, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 88. North America Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 89. North America Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 90. North America Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 91. United States Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 92. United States Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 93. United States Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 94. Canada Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 95. Canada Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 96. Canada Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 97. Mexico Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 98. Mexico Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 99. Mexico Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 100. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 101. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 102. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 103. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 104. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 105. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 106. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 107. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 108. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 109. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 110. Tracking as a Service: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 111. Tracking as a Service Platform-as-a-service , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 112. Tracking as a Service Software-as-a-service , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 113. Tracking as a Service: by End User(USD Million)
  • Table 114. Tracking as a Service Retail , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 115. Tracking as a Service Manufacturing , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 116. Tracking as a Service E-commerce , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 117. Tracking as a Service Consumer electronics , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 118. Tracking as a Service Transportation , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 119. Tracking as a Service Distribution & Delivery , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 120. Tracking as a Service Healthcare , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 121. Tracking as a Service Security , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 122. Tracking as a Service Others , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 123. Tracking as a Service: by Location(USD Million)
  • Table 124. Tracking as a Service Indoor , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 125. Tracking as a Service Outdoor , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 126. South America Tracking as a Service, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 127. South America Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 128. South America Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 129. South America Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 130. Brazil Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 131. Brazil Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 132. Brazil Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 133. Argentina Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 134. Argentina Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 135. Argentina Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 136. Rest of South America Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 137. Rest of South America Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 138. Rest of South America Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 139. Asia Pacific Tracking as a Service, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 140. Asia Pacific Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 141. Asia Pacific Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 142. Asia Pacific Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 143. China Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 144. China Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 145. China Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 146. Japan Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 147. Japan Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 148. Japan Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 149. India Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 150. India Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 151. India Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 152. South Korea Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 153. South Korea Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 154. South Korea Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 155. Taiwan Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 156. Taiwan Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 157. Taiwan Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 158. Australia Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 159. Australia Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 160. Australia Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 161. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 162. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 163. Rest of Asia-Pacific Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 164. Europe Tracking as a Service, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 165. Europe Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 166. Europe Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 167. Europe Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 168. Germany Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 169. Germany Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 170. Germany Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 171. France Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 172. France Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 173. France Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 174. Italy Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 175. Italy Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 176. Italy Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 177. United Kingdom Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 178. United Kingdom Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 179. United Kingdom Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 180. Netherlands Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 181. Netherlands Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 182. Netherlands Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 183. Rest of Europe Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 184. Rest of Europe Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 185. Rest of Europe Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 186. MEA Tracking as a Service, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 187. MEA Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 188. MEA Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 189. MEA Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 190. Middle East Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 191. Middle East Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 192. Middle East Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 193. Africa Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 194. Africa Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 195. Africa Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 196. North America Tracking as a Service, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 197. North America Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 198. North America Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 199. North America Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 200. United States Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 201. United States Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 202. United States Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 203. Canada Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 204. Canada Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 205. Canada Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 206. Mexico Tracking as a Service, by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 207. Mexico Tracking as a Service, by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 208. Mexico Tracking as a Service, by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 209. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 210. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 211. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Tracking as a Service: by Type USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Figure 5. Global Tracking as a Service: by End User USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Figure 6. Global Tracking as a Service: by Location USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Figure 7. South America Tracking as a Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Tracking as a Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Tracking as a Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Tracking as a Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Tracking as a Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Tracking as a Service share by Players 2022 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Tracking as a Service share by Players (Top 3) 2022(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Tracking as a Service share by Players (Top 5) 2022(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. Motorola Solutions (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. Motorola Solutions (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 18. Wabco (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Wabco (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 20. AT&T (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. AT&T (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 22. Zebra Technologies (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Zebra Technologies (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 24. Verizon (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Verizon (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 26. Geotab (Canada) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Geotab (Canada) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 28. Blackline Safety (Canada) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. Blackline Safety (Canada) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 30. Spidertracks (New Zealand) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. Spidertracks (New Zealand) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 32. Honeywell (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. Honeywell (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 34. Trimble (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. Trimble (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 36. Global Tracking as a Service: by Type USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Figure 37. Global Tracking as a Service: by End User USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Figure 38. Global Tracking as a Service: by Location USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Figure 39. South America Tracking as a Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 40. Asia Pacific Tracking as a Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 41. Europe Tracking as a Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. MEA Tracking as a Service Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. North America Tracking as a Service Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Motorola Solutions (United States)
  • Wabco (United States)
  • AT&T (United States)
  • Zebra Technologies (United States)
  • Verizon (United States)
  • Geotab (Canada)
  • Blackline Safety (Canada)
  • Spidertracks (New Zealand)
  • Honeywell (United States)
  • Trimble (United States)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


May 2023 241 Pages 85 Tables Base Year: 2022 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now
Global Tracking as a Service Quantitative research analysis
Global Tracking as a Service Qualitative Industry Analysis
DOWNLOAD SAMPLE PDF

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

The Tracking as a Service study can be customized to meet your requirements. The market size breakdown by type, by end-use application.
The Tracking as a Service Market is gaining popularity and expected to see strong valuation by 2028 .
According to AMA, the Global Tracking as a Service market is expected to see growth rate of xx%.
The Tracking as a Service market study includes a random mix of players, including both market leaders and some top growing emerging players. Connect with our sales executive to get a complete of companies available in our research coverage.

Know More About Global Tracking as a Service Report?

Have a Query? Click Here

Other Related Reports

Industrial Robotics Rental Comprehensive Study by Application (Material Handling, Welding and Soldering, Assembly Line, Processing, Other), Service Provider (OEMs, Distributors), End Use Industry (Au...
$ 3450
Cafe Chain Comprehensive Study by Café Type (Café Bakery, Student Café, Parisian Café, Sidewalk Café, Grab-And-Go Café, Others), Service Type (Dine-in, Take Away) Players and Region - Global Market O...
$ 3500
Ship Leasing Comprehensive Study by Type (Operating Lease, Finance Lease), Application (Container Ship, Bulk Carrier, Other), Lease Plan (Periodic Tenancy, Bare Boat Charter, Real-time Lease, Other),...
$ 3450
Procurement Outsourcing Services Comprehensive Study by Type (Category Management, Source Management, Procurement Management, Supplier Management), Application (BFSI, Energy and Utilities, Healthcare...
$ 3350
Esport Agency Service Comprehensive Study by Type (Training, Sponsorship, Marketing, Contract Negotiation, Event Production, Players Social Media Management), Application (Match Agent, Player Interme...
$ 3350
Hosted Virtual Desktop Services Comprehensive Study by Application (BFSI, Education, Government, Healthcare, Telecom & IT, Others), Enterprise Size (Small Enterprise, Medium Enterprise, Large Enterpr...
$ 3650