Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Comprehensive Study by Type (Platforms/Tools, Services), Application (Patch Management, Configuration Management, Threat Intelligence, Others), Deployment Type (On-premises, Cloud), End-User (Enterprise, Data Centers, Service Providers) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027  

  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
What is Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Market Scope?
Security and attack simulation is a technology used to automate the techniques used to authenticate the actual effectiveness of security controllers. This IT security technology can automatically detect vulnerabilities in a company's cyber defense. The technology enables security teams to prioritize the results and simulate the attacks. It provides operations teams with automation solutions with seamless integration to improve overall security posture as well as efficiency against various threats. The best-automated security and attack simulation tools prioritize and mention the fixes that need to be made to increase security staff time and thereby reduce the risk of cyberattacks. After the outbreak of COVID-19, the frequency and complexity of cyberattacks have increased fivefold worldwide, according to the WHO. Cyber attackers have carried out attacks on companies of all sizes in industries from BFSI to retail and e-commerce to critical infrastructure and IT companies. To protect themselves against financial and reputational damage, the organizations have increased the implementation of security measures worldwide.

The Automated Breach and Attack Simulation market study is being classified by Type (Platforms/Tools and Services), by Application (Patch Management, Configuration Management, Threat Intelligence and Others) and major geographies with country level break-up.

The companies are now exploring the market by adopting mergers & acquisitions, expansions, investments, new developments in existing products, and collaborations as their preferred strategies. The players are also exploring new geographies and industries through expansions and acquisitions so as to avail a competitive advantage through combined synergies. Analysts at AMA predicts that Players from United States will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation market throughout the predicted period.

Qualys (United States), Rapid7 (United States), Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel), DXC Technology (United States), AttackIQ (United States), Cymulate Ltd. (Israel), XM Cyber (Israel), Skybox Security (United States), SafeBreach (United States), Firemon, LLC (United States), FireEye (United States), NopSec (United States) and Threatcare (United States) are some of the key players profiled in the study. Additionally, the Players which are also part of the research are Mazebolt (Israel) and Scythe (United States).

Segmentation Analysis
Analyst at AMA have segmented the market study of Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation market by Type, Application and Region.

On the basis of geography, the market of Automated Breach and Attack Simulation has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico).

Market Influencers and their development strategies
In April 2019, Rapid7 acquired NetFort, a provider of end-to-end visibility and analytics for network traffic in the cloud, to integrate NetFort's network monitoring, visibility, and analytics capabilities into the Insight Cloud to help customers to move forward safely.
In October 2020 Rapid7 updated its MDR service and added Active Response. These advanced capabilities extend end-to-end threat detection and response to 24/7 threats to reduce attacker residence time, reduce response time, and contain user and endpoint threats.


Influencing Market Trend
  • The Increased Use of Smartphones for Online Transactions and Online Shopping
  • Increasing BYOD Trend across Enterprises of All Sizes

Market Drivers
  • The Increasing Number of Cyberattack
  • Increasing Complexities in Managing Security Threats Due To an Increased Number of Attack Vectors
  • Growing Penalties for Mismanaged Assets Leading To Cyber Thefts
  • The Rise in Stringent Compliance Mandates Governing Organizations

Opportunities
  • An Increase in the Demand for Automated Breach and Simulation for Enhancing the Security Infrastructure of the Organization
  • Increasing Digitization Initiatives Resulting In Increased Dependency on IoT Devices Necessitating Timely ABAS
  • The High Adoption of Technologically Advanced Solutions

Restraints
  • Security Breaches Due To Internal Vulnerabilities

Challenges
  • Lack of Skilled Security Experts


Key Target Audience
Providers of Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, End-Users, Potential Investors, Market Research Firms, Regulatory Bodies and Others

Customization available in this Study:
The Study can be customized to meet your requirements. Please connect with our representative, who will ensure you get a report that suits your needs.

To compete effectively, companies also require quantitative estimates of the future growth and qualitative nature of the market. AMA Research features not just specific market sizing estimates, but also include significant value-added commentary on Technological Trends and Innovations, Regulatory Policies, Market Maturity Indicators, Market Share Movements, New Entrants into the Market & Entry/Exit Barriers, Consumer Demographics, Supporting Company Financial and Cash Flow Planning, Open Up New Markets , To Seize Powerful Market Opportunities, Key Decision in Planning and to Further Expand Market Share, Identify Key Business Segments, Market Proposition & Gap Analysis.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Platforms/Tools
  • Services
By Application
  • Patch Management
  • Configuration Management
  • Threat Intelligence
  • Others
By Deployment Type
  • On-premises
  • Cloud

By End-User
  • Enterprise
  • Data Centers
  • Service Providers

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. The Increasing Number of Cyberattack
      • 3.2.2. Increasing Complexities in Managing Security Threats Due To an Increased Number of Attack Vectors
      • 3.2.3. Growing Penalties for Mismanaged Assets Leading To Cyber Thefts
      • 3.2.4. The Rise in Stringent Compliance Mandates Governing Organizations
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Lack of Skilled Security Experts
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. The Increased Use of Smartphones for Online Transactions and Online Shopping
      • 3.4.2. Increasing BYOD Trend across Enterprises of All Sizes
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type, Application, Deployment Type, End-User and Region (value and price ) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Platforms/Tools
        • 5.2.1.2. Services
      • 5.2.2. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Patch Management
        • 5.2.2.2. Configuration Management
        • 5.2.2.3. Threat Intelligence
        • 5.2.2.4. Others
      • 5.2.3. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation by: Deployment Type (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. On-premises
        • 5.2.3.2. Cloud
      • 5.2.4. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation by: End-User (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Enterprise
        • 5.2.4.2. Data Centers
        • 5.2.4.3. Service Providers
      • 5.2.5. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 5.3. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation (Price)
      • 5.3.1. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation by: Type (Price)
  • 6. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Qualys (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Rapid7 (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. DXC Technology (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. AttackIQ (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Cymulate Ltd. (Israel)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. XM Cyber (Israel)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Skybox Security (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. SafeBreach (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Firemon, LLC (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.11. FireEye (United States)
        • 6.4.11.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.11.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.11.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.11.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.12. NopSec (United States)
        • 6.4.12.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.12.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.12.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.12.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.13. Threatcare (United States)
        • 6.4.13.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.13.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.13.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.13.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Sale, by Type, Application, Deployment Type, End-User and Region (value and price ) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Platforms/Tools
        • 7.2.1.2. Services
      • 7.2.2. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Patch Management
        • 7.2.2.2. Configuration Management
        • 7.2.2.3. Threat Intelligence
        • 7.2.2.4. Others
      • 7.2.3. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation by: Deployment Type (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. On-premises
        • 7.2.3.2. Cloud
      • 7.2.4. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation by: End-User (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Enterprise
        • 7.2.4.2. Data Centers
        • 7.2.4.3. Service Providers
      • 7.2.5. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 7.3. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation (Price)
      • 7.3.1. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation by: Type (Price)
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Platforms/Tools , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Services , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 5. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Patch Management , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Configuration Management , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 7. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Threat Intelligence , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 8. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Others , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Deployment Type(USD Million)
  • Table 10. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation On-premises , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Cloud , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 12. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by End-User(USD Million)
  • Table 13. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Enterprise , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Data Centers , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Service Providers , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. Brazil Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. Brazil Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. Brazil Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. Brazil Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Argentina Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. Argentina Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Argentina Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Argentina Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. Rest of South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Rest of South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. Rest of South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. Rest of South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. China Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. China Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. China Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. China Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. Japan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. Japan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. Japan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. Japan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. India Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. India Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. India Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. India Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. South Korea Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. South Korea Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. South Korea Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. South Korea Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. Taiwan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. Taiwan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. Taiwan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. Taiwan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. Australia Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. Australia Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. Australia Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. Australia Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Germany Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Germany Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Germany Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. Germany Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. France Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. France Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. France Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. France Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Italy Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Italy Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Italy Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. Italy Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. United Kingdom Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. United Kingdom Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. United Kingdom Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. United Kingdom Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. Netherlands Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. Netherlands Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. Netherlands Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. Netherlands Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. Rest of Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Rest of Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Rest of Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Rest of Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 98. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 99. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 100. Middle East Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 101. Middle East Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 102. Middle East Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 103. Middle East Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 104. Africa Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 105. Africa Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 106. Africa Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 107. Africa Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 108. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 109. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 110. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 111. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 112. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 113. United States Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 114. United States Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 115. United States Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 116. United States Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 117. Canada Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 118. Canada Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 119. Canada Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 120. Canada Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 121. Mexico Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 122. Mexico Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 123. Mexico Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 124. Mexico Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 125. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 126. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 127. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 128. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 129. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 130. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 131. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 132. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 133. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 134. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 135. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 136. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 137. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 138. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 139. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 140. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Platforms/Tools , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 141. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Services , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 142. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 143. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Patch Management , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 144. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Configuration Management , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 145. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Threat Intelligence , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 146. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Others , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Deployment Type(USD Million)
  • Table 148. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation On-premises , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Cloud , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 150. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by End-User(USD Million)
  • Table 151. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Enterprise , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Data Centers , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 153. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Service Providers , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 154. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 156. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. Brazil Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. Brazil Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. Brazil Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. Brazil Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. Argentina Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Argentina Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. Argentina Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. Argentina Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. Rest of South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. Rest of South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. Rest of South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Rest of South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. China Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. China Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. China Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. China Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. Japan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. Japan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. Japan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. Japan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. India Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. India Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. India Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. India Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. South Korea Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. South Korea Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. South Korea Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. South Korea Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. Taiwan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. Taiwan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. Taiwan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. Taiwan Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. Australia Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. Australia Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. Australia Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. Australia Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Rest of Asia-Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 205. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 206. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 207. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 208. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 209. Germany Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 210. Germany Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 211. Germany Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 212. Germany Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 213. France Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 214. France Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 215. France Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 216. France Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 217. Italy Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 218. Italy Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 219. Italy Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 220. Italy Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 221. United Kingdom Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 222. United Kingdom Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 223. United Kingdom Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 224. United Kingdom Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 225. Netherlands Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 226. Netherlands Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 227. Netherlands Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 228. Netherlands Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 229. Rest of Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 230. Rest of Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 231. Rest of Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 232. Rest of Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 233. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 234. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 235. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 236. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 237. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 238. Middle East Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 239. Middle East Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 240. Middle East Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 241. Middle East Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 242. Africa Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 243. Africa Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 244. Africa Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 245. Africa Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 246. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 247. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 248. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 249. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 250. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 251. United States Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 252. United States Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 253. United States Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 254. United States Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 255. Canada Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 256. Canada Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 257. Canada Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 258. Canada Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 259. Mexico Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 260. Mexico Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 261. Mexico Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 262. Mexico Automated Breach and Attack Simulation, by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 263. Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 264. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 265. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 266. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Deployment Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by End-User USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 8. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Type USD/Units (2015-2020)
  • Figure 14. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 15. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 16. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 17. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 18. Qualys (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Qualys (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 20. Rapid7 (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Rapid7 (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 22. Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 24. DXC Technology (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. DXC Technology (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 26. AttackIQ (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. AttackIQ (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 28. Cymulate Ltd. (Israel) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. Cymulate Ltd. (Israel) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 30. XM Cyber (Israel) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. XM Cyber (Israel) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 32. Skybox Security (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. Skybox Security (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 34. SafeBreach (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. SafeBreach (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 36. Firemon, LLC (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 37. Firemon, LLC (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 38. FireEye (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 39. FireEye (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 40. NopSec (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 41. NopSec (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 42. Threatcare (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 43. Threatcare (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 44. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 45. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 46. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Deployment Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 47. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by End-User USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 48. South America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 49. Asia Pacific Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 50. Europe Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 51. MEA Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 52. North America Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 53. Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation: by Type USD/Units (2021-2026)
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Qualys (United States)
  • Rapid7 (United States)
  • Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel)
  • DXC Technology (United States)
  • AttackIQ (United States)
  • Cymulate Ltd. (Israel)
  • XM Cyber (Israel)
  • Skybox Security (United States)
  • SafeBreach (United States)
  • Firemon, LLC (United States)
  • FireEye (United States)
  • NopSec (United States)
  • Threatcare (United States)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Mazebolt (Israel) , Scythe (United States)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Aug 2021 248 Pages 78 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

The Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation market is expected to see a growth of % during projected year 2020 to 2026.
The prominent players of Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation market are Qualys (United States), Rapid7 (United States), Cronus-Cyber Technologies (Israel), DXC Technology (United States), AttackIQ (United States), Cymulate Ltd. (Israel), XM Cyber (Israel), Skybox Security (United States), SafeBreach (United States), Firemon, LLC (United States), FireEye (United States), NopSec (United States) and Threatcare (United States), to name a few.
In this highly competitive & fast evolving Automated Breach and Attack Simulation industry, the top strategic priorities would remain consistent like innovation, R&D and M&A.

Know More About Global Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Market Report?