Oil Condition Monitoring Comprehensive Study by Type (Turbines, Compressors, Engines, Gear Systems, Hydraulic Systems), Measurement (Temperature, Pressure, Density, Viscosity, Dielectric, TAN, TBN, Water Dilution, Fuel Dilution, Soot, Wear Particles), Industry (Transportation, Industrial, Oil & Gas, Energy & Power, Mining), Sampling (On-site, Off-site) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Oil Condition Monitoring Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027 | CAGR: 9.2%  

  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Industry Background:
The testing of oil condition monitoring is done in order to avoid machinery failures. The machinery failures may cause by the contamination or because of the wrong lubricant. As the proper lubrication of machinery is the significant contributor to the long, problem free life of machinery. The effective monitoring of lubricant oil enables maintenance to be scheduled efficiently, minimizing the risk of damage to expensive plants and avoiding unscheduled downtime. The analysis of greases, lubricating oil, and hydraulic fluids offers a fast as well as an accurate picture of what is happening inside gearboxes, power generators, compressors, hydraulic systems, and other critical machines. Different types of tests are conducted for the oil condition monitoring including marine lubricants quality scanning, wear metals testing, OCM testing, ferrography testing, and others.According to AMA Research, the market for Oil Condition Monitoring is expected to register a CAGR of 9.2% during the forecast period to 2026. This growth is primarily driven by Increasing Requirement for the Time Optimization, Growing Demand for the Solutions That Will Be Cost-Effective, The Growing Demand for Electricity and The Increasing Need for the Energy Management.

Globally, a noticeable market trend is evident Latest Technological Advancements in Oil Condition Monitoring. Major Manufacturers, such as Bureau Veritas (France), Castrol Limited (United Kingdom), Chevron Corporation (United States), General Electric (United States), Intertek Group Plc (United States), Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Ltd (United States), SPECTRO Analytical Instruments GmbH (Germany), Royal Dutch Shell plc (Netherlands), TRIBOMAR GmbH (Germany) and Unimarine (Singapore) etc have either set up their manufacturing facilities or are planning to start new provision in the dominated region in the upcoming years.

On 27 Feb 2019, Bureau Veritas, a world leader in testing, inspection and certification, and Microsoft, the leader in productivity platforms and services, has announced the conclusion of a global technical & business collaboration for the development of laboratory testing services based on artificial intelligence. and On 21 Nov 2017, Veritas Petroleum Services has announced the latest expansion of the company’s lubricant oil condition monitoring (OCM) service.

Market Drivers
  • Increasing Requirement for the Time Optimization
  • Growing Demand for the Solutions That Will Be Cost-Effective
  • The Growing Demand for Electricity
  • The Increasing Need for the Energy Management

Market Trend
  • Latest Technological Advancements in Oil Condition Monitoring

Restraints
  • Oil Prices and Geopolitical Factors
  • Low Adoption of Oil Condition Monitoring Solutions in Emerging Countries

Opportunities
The Rising Demand from Emerging Countries

AMA Research follow a focused and realistic research framework that provides the ability to study the crucial market dynamics in several regions across the world. Moreover, an in-depth assessment is mostly conducted by our analysts on geographical regions to provide clients and businesses the opportunity to dominate in niche markets and expand in emerging markets across the globe. This market research study also showcase the spontaneously changing Manufacturers landscape impacting the growth of the market. Furthermore, our market researchers extensively analyse the products and services offered by multiple players competing to increase their market share and presence.

Customization in the Report
AMA Research features not only specific market forecasts, but also include significant value-added commentary on:
- Market Trends
- Technological Trends and Innovations
- Market Maturity Indicators
- Growth Drivers and Constraints
- New Entrants into the Market & Entry/Exit Barriers
- To Seize Powerful Market Opportunities
- Identify Key Business Segments, Market Proposition & Gap Analysis

Against this Challenging Backdrop, Oil Condition Monitoring Study Sheds Light on
— The Oil Condition Monitoring Market status quo and key characteristics. To end this, Analyst at AMA organize and took survey of the Oil Condition Monitoring industry Manufacturers. The resultant snapshot serves as a basis for understanding why and how the industry can be expected to change.
— Where Oil Condition Monitoring industry is heading and what are the top priorities. Insights are drawn from financial analysis, the survey and interviews with key executives and industry experts.
— How every company in this diverse set of Manufacturers can best navigate the emerging competition landscape and follow a strategy that helps them position to hold value they currently claim, or capture the new addressable opportunity.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Turbines
  • Compressors
  • Engines
  • Gear Systems
  • Hydraulic Systems
By Measurement
  • Temperature
  • Pressure
  • Density
  • Viscosity
  • Dielectric
  • TAN
  • TBN
  • Water Dilution
  • Fuel Dilution
  • Soot
  • Wear Particles

By Industry
  • Transportation
  • Industrial
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy & Power
  • Mining

By Sampling
  • On-site
  • Off-site

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Increasing Requirement for the Time Optimization
      • 3.2.2. Growing Demand for the Solutions That Will Be Cost-Effective
      • 3.2.3. The Growing Demand for Electricity
      • 3.2.4. The Increasing Need for the Energy Management
    • 3.3. Market Trends
      • 3.3.1. Latest Technological Advancements in Oil Condition Monitoring
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type, Measurement, Industry, Sampling and Region (value) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Oil Condition Monitoring (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Oil Condition Monitoring by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Turbines
        • 5.2.1.2. Compressors
        • 5.2.1.3. Engines
        • 5.2.1.4. Gear Systems
        • 5.2.1.5. Hydraulic Systems
      • 5.2.2. Global Oil Condition Monitoring by: Measurement (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Temperature
        • 5.2.2.2. Pressure
        • 5.2.2.3. Density
        • 5.2.2.4. Viscosity
        • 5.2.2.5. Dielectric
        • 5.2.2.6. TAN
        • 5.2.2.7. TBN
        • 5.2.2.8. Water Dilution
        • 5.2.2.9. Fuel Dilution
        • 5.2.2.10. Soot
        • 5.2.2.11. Wear Particles
      • 5.2.3. Global Oil Condition Monitoring by: Industry (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Transportation
        • 5.2.3.2. Industrial
        • 5.2.3.3. Oil & Gas
        • 5.2.3.4. Energy & Power
        • 5.2.3.5. Mining
      • 5.2.4. Global Oil Condition Monitoring by: Sampling (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. On-site
        • 5.2.4.2. Off-site
      • 5.2.5. Global Oil Condition Monitoring Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Oil Condition Monitoring: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Bureau Veritas (France)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Castrol Limited (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Chevron Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. General Electric (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Intertek Group Plc (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Ltd (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. SPECTRO Analytical Instruments GmbH (Germany)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Royal Dutch Shell plc (Netherlands)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. TRIBOMAR GmbH (Germany)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Unimarine (Singapore)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Oil Condition Monitoring Sale, by Type, Measurement, Industry, Sampling and Region (value) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Oil Condition Monitoring (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Oil Condition Monitoring by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Turbines
        • 7.2.1.2. Compressors
        • 7.2.1.3. Engines
        • 7.2.1.4. Gear Systems
        • 7.2.1.5. Hydraulic Systems
      • 7.2.2. Global Oil Condition Monitoring by: Measurement (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Temperature
        • 7.2.2.2. Pressure
        • 7.2.2.3. Density
        • 7.2.2.4. Viscosity
        • 7.2.2.5. Dielectric
        • 7.2.2.6. TAN
        • 7.2.2.7. TBN
        • 7.2.2.8. Water Dilution
        • 7.2.2.9. Fuel Dilution
        • 7.2.2.10. Soot
        • 7.2.2.11. Wear Particles
      • 7.2.3. Global Oil Condition Monitoring by: Industry (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Transportation
        • 7.2.3.2. Industrial
        • 7.2.3.3. Oil & Gas
        • 7.2.3.4. Energy & Power
        • 7.2.3.5. Mining
      • 7.2.4. Global Oil Condition Monitoring by: Sampling (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. On-site
        • 7.2.4.2. Off-site
      • 7.2.5. Global Oil Condition Monitoring Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Oil Condition Monitoring: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Oil Condition Monitoring Turbines , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Oil Condition Monitoring Compressors , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Oil Condition Monitoring Engines , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 5. Oil Condition Monitoring Gear Systems , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Oil Condition Monitoring Hydraulic Systems , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 7. Oil Condition Monitoring: by Measurement(USD Million)
  • Table 8. Oil Condition Monitoring Temperature , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Oil Condition Monitoring Pressure , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Oil Condition Monitoring Density , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Oil Condition Monitoring Viscosity , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 12. Oil Condition Monitoring Dielectric , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Oil Condition Monitoring TAN , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. Oil Condition Monitoring TBN , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. Oil Condition Monitoring Water Dilution , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. Oil Condition Monitoring Fuel Dilution , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. Oil Condition Monitoring Soot , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. Oil Condition Monitoring Wear Particles , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Oil Condition Monitoring: by Industry(USD Million)
  • Table 20. Oil Condition Monitoring Transportation , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. Oil Condition Monitoring Industrial , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. Oil Condition Monitoring Oil & Gas , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. Oil Condition Monitoring Energy & Power , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. Oil Condition Monitoring Mining , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Oil Condition Monitoring: by Sampling(USD Million)
  • Table 26. Oil Condition Monitoring On-site , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Oil Condition Monitoring Off-site , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. Brazil Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Brazil Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Brazil Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Brazil Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. Argentina Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. Argentina Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. Argentina Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. Argentina Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. Rest of South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. Rest of South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. Rest of South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. Rest of South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. China Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. China Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. China Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. China Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. Japan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. Japan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. Japan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. Japan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. India Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. India Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. India Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. India Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. South Korea Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. South Korea Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. South Korea Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. South Korea Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. Taiwan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. Taiwan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Taiwan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Taiwan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Australia Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Australia Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Australia Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Australia Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. Rest of Asia-Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. Rest of Asia-Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. Rest of Asia-Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. Rest of Asia-Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. Germany Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. Germany Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. Germany Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. Germany Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. France Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. France Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. France Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. France Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. Italy Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Italy Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Italy Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Italy Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. United Kingdom Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. United Kingdom Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. United Kingdom Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 98. United Kingdom Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 99. Netherlands Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 100. Netherlands Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 101. Netherlands Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 102. Netherlands Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 103. Rest of Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 104. Rest of Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 105. Rest of Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 106. Rest of Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 107. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 108. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 109. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 110. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 111. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 112. Middle East Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 113. Middle East Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 114. Middle East Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 115. Middle East Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 116. Africa Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 117. Africa Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 118. Africa Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 119. Africa Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 120. North America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 121. North America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 122. North America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 123. North America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 124. North America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 125. United States Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 126. United States Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 127. United States Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 128. United States Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 129. Canada Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 130. Canada Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 131. Canada Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 132. Canada Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 133. Mexico Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 134. Mexico Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 135. Mexico Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 136. Mexico Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 137. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 138. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 139. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 140. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 141. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 142. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 143. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 144. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 145. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 146. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 147. Oil Condition Monitoring: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 148. Oil Condition Monitoring Turbines , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. Oil Condition Monitoring Compressors , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 150. Oil Condition Monitoring Engines , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. Oil Condition Monitoring Gear Systems , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Oil Condition Monitoring Hydraulic Systems , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 153. Oil Condition Monitoring: by Measurement(USD Million)
  • Table 154. Oil Condition Monitoring Temperature , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. Oil Condition Monitoring Pressure , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 156. Oil Condition Monitoring Density , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. Oil Condition Monitoring Viscosity , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. Oil Condition Monitoring Dielectric , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. Oil Condition Monitoring TAN , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. Oil Condition Monitoring TBN , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. Oil Condition Monitoring Water Dilution , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. Oil Condition Monitoring Fuel Dilution , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. Oil Condition Monitoring Soot , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Oil Condition Monitoring Wear Particles , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. Oil Condition Monitoring: by Industry(USD Million)
  • Table 166. Oil Condition Monitoring Transportation , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. Oil Condition Monitoring Industrial , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. Oil Condition Monitoring Oil & Gas , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. Oil Condition Monitoring Energy & Power , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Oil Condition Monitoring Mining , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Oil Condition Monitoring: by Sampling(USD Million)
  • Table 172. Oil Condition Monitoring On-site , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. Oil Condition Monitoring Off-site , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. Brazil Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. Brazil Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. Brazil Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. Brazil Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. Argentina Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. Argentina Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Argentina Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Argentina Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. Rest of South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. Rest of South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. Rest of South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. Rest of South America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. China Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. China Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. China Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. China Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. Japan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. Japan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. Japan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Japan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. India Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 205. India Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 206. India Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 207. India Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 208. South Korea Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 209. South Korea Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 210. South Korea Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 211. South Korea Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 212. Taiwan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 213. Taiwan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 214. Taiwan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 215. Taiwan Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 216. Australia Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 217. Australia Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 218. Australia Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 219. Australia Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 220. Rest of Asia-Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 221. Rest of Asia-Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 222. Rest of Asia-Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 223. Rest of Asia-Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 224. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 225. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 226. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 227. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 228. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 229. Germany Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 230. Germany Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 231. Germany Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 232. Germany Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 233. France Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 234. France Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 235. France Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 236. France Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 237. Italy Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 238. Italy Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 239. Italy Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 240. Italy Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 241. United Kingdom Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 242. United Kingdom Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 243. United Kingdom Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 244. United Kingdom Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 245. Netherlands Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 246. Netherlands Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 247. Netherlands Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 248. Netherlands Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 249. Rest of Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 250. Rest of Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 251. Rest of Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 252. Rest of Europe Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 253. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 254. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 255. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 256. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 257. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 258. Middle East Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 259. Middle East Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 260. Middle East Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 261. Middle East Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 262. Africa Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 263. Africa Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 264. Africa Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 265. Africa Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 266. North America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 267. North America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 268. North America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 269. North America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 270. North America Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 271. United States Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 272. United States Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 273. United States Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 274. United States Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 275. Canada Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 276. Canada Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 277. Canada Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 278. Canada Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 279. Mexico Oil Condition Monitoring, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 280. Mexico Oil Condition Monitoring, by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 281. Mexico Oil Condition Monitoring, by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 282. Mexico Oil Condition Monitoring, by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 283. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 284. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 285. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Oil Condition Monitoring: by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Oil Condition Monitoring: by Measurement USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Oil Condition Monitoring: by Industry USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. Global Oil Condition Monitoring: by Sampling USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 8. South America Oil Condition Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Oil Condition Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Oil Condition Monitoring share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 14. Global Oil Condition Monitoring share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 15. Global Oil Condition Monitoring share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 16. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 17. Bureau Veritas (France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 18. Bureau Veritas (France) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 19. Castrol Limited (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 20. Castrol Limited (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 21. Chevron Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 22. Chevron Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 23. General Electric (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 24. General Electric (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 25. Intertek Group Plc (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 26. Intertek Group Plc (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 27. Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Ltd (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 28. Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Ltd (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 29. SPECTRO Analytical Instruments GmbH (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 30. SPECTRO Analytical Instruments GmbH (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 31. Royal Dutch Shell plc (Netherlands) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 32. Royal Dutch Shell plc (Netherlands) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 33. TRIBOMAR GmbH (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 34. TRIBOMAR GmbH (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 35. Unimarine (Singapore) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 36. Unimarine (Singapore) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 37. Global Oil Condition Monitoring: by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 38. Global Oil Condition Monitoring: by Measurement USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 39. Global Oil Condition Monitoring: by Industry USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 40. Global Oil Condition Monitoring: by Sampling USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 41. South America Oil Condition Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. Asia Pacific Oil Condition Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. Europe Oil Condition Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 44. MEA Oil Condition Monitoring Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 45. North America Oil Condition Monitoring Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Bureau Veritas (France)
  • Castrol Limited (United Kingdom)
  • Chevron Corporation (United States)
  • General Electric (United States)
  • Intertek Group Plc (United States)
  • Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Ltd (United States)
  • SPECTRO Analytical Instruments GmbH (Germany)
  • Royal Dutch Shell plc (Netherlands)
  • TRIBOMAR GmbH (Germany)
  • Unimarine (Singapore)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
AVENISENSE S.A. (France) , Poseidon Systems, LLC (United States) , Micromem Applied Sensor Technologies Inc. (United States) , Delta Services Industriels (DSi) (Belgium)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Jun 2021 232 Pages 94 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

Historical year: 2016-2020; Base year: 2020; Forecast period: 2021 to 2026
Companies that are profiled in Global Oil Condition Monitoring Market are Bureau Veritas (France), Castrol Limited (United Kingdom), Chevron Corporation (United States), General Electric (United States), Intertek Group Plc (United States), Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Ltd (United States), SPECTRO Analytical Instruments GmbH (Germany), Royal Dutch Shell plc (Netherlands), TRIBOMAR GmbH (Germany) and Unimarine (Singapore) etc.
The testing of oil condition monitoring is done in order to avoid machinery failures. The machinery failures may cause by the contamination or because of the wrong lubricant. As the proper lubrication of machinery is the significant contributor to the long, problem free life of machinery. The effective monitoring of lubricant oil enables maintenance to be scheduled efficiently, minimizing the risk of damage to expensive plants and avoiding unscheduled downtime. The analysis of greases, lubricating oil, and hydraulic fluids offers a fast as well as an accurate picture of what is happening inside gearboxes, power generators, compressors, hydraulic systems, and other critical machines. Different types of tests are conducted for the oil condition monitoring including marine lubricants quality scanning, wear metals testing, OCM testing, ferrography testing, and others.

Know More About Global and Regional Oil Condition Monitoring Report?