Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Comprehensive Study by Application (Healthcare Payer, Healthcare Service Provider), Delivery Mode (On-premise, Cloud-based), Component (Software, Service (Claim Processing, Credit Balances and Refund Processing, Denial Management, Payment Posting)) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2028

Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2023-2028  

  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Market Scope
Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) is the process of identifying, collecting, and managing the practice’s revenue from payers based on the services provided. In the healthcare sector, these facilities use to manage the administrative and clinical functions associated with claims processing, payment, and revenue generation. Back-end insurance eligibility verification is one of the most important, and time-consuming aspects of the healthcare revenue cycle. The American Hospital Association found that 43 percent of hospitals have spent more than USD 10,000 in the first quarter of 2016 to manage claim denials and 26 percent have invested over USD 26,000. This has created lucrative opportunities for the back-end revenue cycle management market.



Back-End Revenue Cycle Management research includes a segment specifically devoted to such significant players, where analysts give an insight to each player's financial statements as well as their product benchmarking and SWOT analysis. Key development strategies, market share analysis, and market positioning analysis of the aforementioned competitors internationally are also included in the competitive landscape section Research Analyst at AMA estimates that United States Players will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management market throughout the predicted period.

Athenahealth (United States), GE Healthcare (United States), Cognizant Technology Solutions (United States), McKesson Corporation (United States), Cerner Corporation (United States), Conifer Health Solutions (United States), GeBBs Healthcare Solutions (United States), The SSI Group (United States), Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (United States) and Optum, Inc. (United States) are some of the key players that are part of study coverage. Additionally, the Players which are also part of the research are DST Systems (United States), Quest Diagnostics (United States), eClinicalWorks (United States) and nThrive (United States).

Segmentation Overview
The study have segmented the market of Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management market , by Application (Healthcare Payer and Healthcare Service Provider) and Region with country level break-up.

On the basis of geography, the market of Back-End Revenue Cycle Management has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico).

Influencing Trend:
Synchronization of Data from EHR with an RCM System to Bridge the Gap between the Clinical and Financial Side of Patient Care

Market Growth Drivers:
Enhanced Profitability, Improved Financial Outcomes and, Improved Patient Satisfaction, Increasing Complex Systems of Billing and Coding, Combined With Narrowing Submission Windows Demanded By Insurers, Frequent Change in Healthcare Regulations and Reimbursement Models and Decreasing Cost of Collections with Increased Automation, and Reduce Redundancies

Challenges:
Selection of Professionally Trained Third Party Which Focuses Solely On Coding, Billing, and Submitting Claims

Restraints:
Outsourcing Cost and Security of Patient Health Information and High Cost of Software Installation

Opportunities:
Growing Automation in Healthcare IT to Improve RCM Measures, Integration of Software with EHRs and Technological Developments such as Big Data Analytics and Health IT Solutions

Market Leaders and their Expansionary Development Strategies

In 2017, nThrive, a leading provider of RCM services featured its Patient-to-PaymentTM suite of solutions at the annual meeting of the Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA)
Regulation such as Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Office of Inspector General (OIG), and ICD-10

Key Target Audience
Back-end Revenue Cycle Management Service Providers, Software Developers and Integrators, Software & Service Providers, Healthcare Industries, Partners/Investors, End-Use Industry and Others

About Approach
The research aims to propose a patent-based approach in searching for potential technology partners as a supporting tool for enabling open innovation. The study also proposes a systematic searching process of technology partners as a
preliminary step to select the emerging and key players that are involved in implementing market estimations. While patent analysis is employed to overcome the aforementioned data- and process-related limitations, as expenses occurred in that technology allows us to estimate the market size by evolving segments as target market from the total available market.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Application
  • Healthcare Payer
  • Healthcare Service Provider
By Delivery Mode
  • On-premise
  • Cloud-based

By Component
  • Software
  • Service (Claim Processing, Credit Balances and Refund Processing, Denial Management, Payment Posting)

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Enhanced Profitability, Improved Financial Outcomes and, Improved Patient Satisfaction
      • 3.2.2. Increasing Complex Systems of Billing and Coding, Combined With Narrowing Submission Windows Demanded By Insurers
      • 3.2.3. Frequent Change in Healthcare Regulations and Reimbursement Models
      • 3.2.4. Decreasing Cost of Collections with Increased Automation, and Reduce Redundancies
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Selection of Professionally Trained Third Party Which Focuses Solely On Coding, Billing, and Submitting Claims
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Synchronization of Data from EHR with an RCM System to Bridge the Gap between the Clinical and Financial Side of Patient Care
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application, Delivery Mode, Component and Region (value) (2017-2022)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Healthcare Payer
        • 5.2.1.2. Healthcare Service Provider
      • 5.2.2. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management by: Delivery Mode (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. On-premise
        • 5.2.2.2. Cloud-based
      • 5.2.3. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management by: Component (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Software
        • 5.2.3.2. Service (Claim Processing, Credit Balances and Refund Processing, Denial Management, Payment Posting)
      • 5.2.4. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2022)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Athenahealth (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. GE Healthcare (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Cognizant Technology Solutions (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. McKesson Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Cerner Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Conifer Health Solutions (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. GeBBs Healthcare Solutions (United States)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. The SSI Group (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Optum, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Sale, by Application, Delivery Mode, Component and Region (value) (2023-2028)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Healthcare Payer
        • 7.2.1.2. Healthcare Service Provider
      • 7.2.2. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management by: Delivery Mode (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. On-premise
        • 7.2.2.2. Cloud-based
      • 7.2.3. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management by: Component (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Software
        • 7.2.3.2. Service (Claim Processing, Credit Balances and Refund Processing, Denial Management, Payment Posting)
      • 7.2.4. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Healthcare Payer , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 3. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Healthcare Service Provider , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 4. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Delivery Mode(USD Million)
  • Table 5. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management On-premise , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 6. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Cloud-based , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 7. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Component(USD Million)
  • Table 8. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Software , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 9. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Service (Claim Processing, Credit Balances and Refund Processing, Denial Management, Payment Posting) , by Region USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 10. South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 11. South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 12. South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 13. South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 14. Brazil Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 15. Brazil Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 16. Brazil Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 17. Argentina Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 18. Argentina Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 19. Argentina Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 20. Rest of South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 21. Rest of South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 22. Rest of South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 23. Asia Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 24. Asia Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 25. Asia Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 26. Asia Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 27. China Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 28. China Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 29. China Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 30. Japan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 31. Japan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 32. Japan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 33. India Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 34. India Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 35. India Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 36. South Korea Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 37. South Korea Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 38. South Korea Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 39. Taiwan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 40. Taiwan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 41. Taiwan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 42. Australia Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 43. Australia Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 44. Australia Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 45. Rest of Asia-Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 46. Rest of Asia-Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 47. Rest of Asia-Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 48. Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 49. Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 50. Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 51. Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 52. Germany Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 53. Germany Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 54. Germany Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 55. France Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 56. France Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 57. France Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 58. Italy Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 59. Italy Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 60. Italy Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 61. United Kingdom Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 62. United Kingdom Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 63. United Kingdom Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 64. Netherlands Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 65. Netherlands Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 66. Netherlands Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 67. Rest of Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 68. Rest of Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 69. Rest of Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 70. MEA Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 71. MEA Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 72. MEA Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 73. MEA Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 74. Middle East Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 75. Middle East Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 76. Middle East Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 77. Africa Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 78. Africa Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 79. Africa Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 80. North America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Country USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 81. North America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 82. North America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 83. North America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 84. United States Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 85. United States Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 86. United States Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 87. Canada Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 88. Canada Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 89. Canada Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 90. Mexico Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 91. Mexico Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 92. Mexico Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Table 93. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 94. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 95. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 96. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 97. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 98. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 99. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 100. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 101. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 102. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 103. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 104. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Healthcare Payer , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 105. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Healthcare Service Provider , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 106. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Delivery Mode(USD Million)
  • Table 107. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management On-premise , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 108. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Cloud-based , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 109. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Component(USD Million)
  • Table 110. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Software , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 111. Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Service (Claim Processing, Credit Balances and Refund Processing, Denial Management, Payment Posting) , by Region USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 112. South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 113. South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 114. South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 115. South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 116. Brazil Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 117. Brazil Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 118. Brazil Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 119. Argentina Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 120. Argentina Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 121. Argentina Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 122. Rest of South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 123. Rest of South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 124. Rest of South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 125. Asia Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 126. Asia Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 127. Asia Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 128. Asia Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 129. China Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 130. China Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 131. China Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 132. Japan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 133. Japan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 134. Japan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 135. India Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 136. India Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 137. India Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 138. South Korea Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 139. South Korea Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 140. South Korea Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 141. Taiwan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 142. Taiwan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 143. Taiwan Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 144. Australia Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 145. Australia Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 146. Australia Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 147. Rest of Asia-Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 148. Rest of Asia-Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 149. Rest of Asia-Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 150. Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 151. Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 152. Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 153. Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 154. Germany Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 155. Germany Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 156. Germany Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 157. France Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 158. France Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 159. France Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 160. Italy Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 161. Italy Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 162. Italy Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 163. United Kingdom Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 164. United Kingdom Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 165. United Kingdom Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 166. Netherlands Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 167. Netherlands Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 168. Netherlands Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 169. Rest of Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 170. Rest of Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 171. Rest of Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 172. MEA Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 173. MEA Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 174. MEA Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 175. MEA Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 176. Middle East Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 177. Middle East Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 178. Middle East Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 179. Africa Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 180. Africa Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 181. Africa Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 182. North America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Country USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 183. North America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 184. North America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 185. North America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 186. United States Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 187. United States Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 188. United States Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 189. Canada Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 190. Canada Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 191. Canada Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 192. Mexico Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 193. Mexico Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 194. Mexico Back-End Revenue Cycle Management, by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Table 195. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 196. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 197. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Application USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Figure 5. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Delivery Mode USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Figure 6. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Component USD Million (2017-2022)
  • Figure 7. South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management share by Players 2022 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management share by Players (Top 3) 2022(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management share by Players (Top 5) 2022(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. Athenahealth (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. Athenahealth (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 18. GE Healthcare (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. GE Healthcare (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 20. Cognizant Technology Solutions (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Cognizant Technology Solutions (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 22. McKesson Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. McKesson Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 24. Cerner Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Cerner Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 26. Conifer Health Solutions (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Conifer Health Solutions (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 28. GeBBs Healthcare Solutions (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. GeBBs Healthcare Solutions (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 30. The SSI Group (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. The SSI Group (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 32. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 34. Optum, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. Optum, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2022
  • Figure 36. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Application USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Figure 37. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Delivery Mode USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Figure 38. Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management: by Component USD Million (2023-2028)
  • Figure 39. South America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 40. Asia Pacific Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 41. Europe Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 42. MEA Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. North America Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Athenahealth (United States)
  • GE Healthcare (United States)
  • Cognizant Technology Solutions (United States)
  • McKesson Corporation (United States)
  • Cerner Corporation (United States)
  • Conifer Health Solutions (United States)
  • GeBBs Healthcare Solutions (United States)
  • The SSI Group (United States)
  • Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (United States)
  • Optum, Inc. (United States)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
DST Systems (United States) , Quest Diagnostics (United States) , eClinicalWorks (United States) , nThrive (United States)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


May 2023 201 Pages 75 Tables Base Year: 2022 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

The Back-End Revenue Cycle Management study can be customized to meet your requirements. The market size breakdown by type, by end-use application.
The Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Market is gaining popularity and expected to see strong valuation by 2028 .
According to AMA, the Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management market is expected to see growth rate of xx%.
The Back-End Revenue Cycle Management market study includes a random mix of players, including both market leaders and some top growing emerging players. Connect with our sales executive to get a complete of companies available in our research coverage.

Know More About Global Back-End Revenue Cycle Management Report?