Global Agricultural Packaging research

Agricultural Packaging Comprehensive Study by Type (Pouches & bags, Drums, Bottles & cans, Others (Clamshells, Trays, and Others)), Application (Chemical Pesticides, Chemical Fertilizers, Biologicals), Material (Plastic (Rigid, and Flexible), Metal, Paper & paperboards, Composite materials, Others), Barrier Strength (Medium, High, Low) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Agricultural Packaging Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027 | CAGR: 5.4%  

Access Sample Report Make An Enquiry Before Purchase
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Industry Background:
Agricultural packaging is the packaging involved in agricultural products such as fertilizers, pesticides, and other crop inputs. There are a variety of products, including pouches & bags, drums, bottles & cans, others (clamshells, trays, and others) are used for packaging as per requirement. Materials such as plastic (rigid, and flexible), metal, paper & paperboards, composite materials, and others are used for agricultural packaging. Agricultural packaging provides ventilation of heat and rises the cooling rate of package’s content. During transit & handling, agricultural packaging also adverts probable injury to produce packaging contents. Furthermore, the rise in urbanization along with continuous growing population across the globe is expected to create huge pressure on the overall food production resultant in high demand for efficient & cost effective agricultural packaging solutions.
According to AMA, the market for Agricultural Packaging is expected to register a CAGR of 5.4% during the forecast period to 2026. This growth is primarily driven by Growing Trade of Agrochemicals and Improved Shelf Life of Agrochemicals & Biologicals.

The Paper Packaging sector in the Asia-Pacific region has been increasing at a sustainable rate and further growth is expected to be witnessed over the forecast period, owing to the robust investments and expansion in production facilities in the region. Major Vendors, such as Amcor Limited (Australia), Bemis Company, Inc. (United States), Greif, Inc. (United States), Mondi Group (Austria), Packaging Corporation of America (United States), NNZ Group (The Netherlands), LC Packaging International B.V (The Netherlands), ProAmpac LLC (United States), Kenvos Biotech Co., Ltd. (China) and Crown Holdings Incorporated (United States) etc have either set up their manufacturing facilities or are planning to start new provision in the dominated region in the upcoming years.

Market Drivers
  • Growing Trade of Agrochemicals
  • Improved Shelf Life of Agrochemicals & Biologicals

Market Trend

Restraints
  • Fluctuating Raw Material Prices for Plastic Packaging

Opportunities
Growing Focus on Development of Efficient & Environment-Friendly Packaging and Strict Environmental Regulations Encouraging the Development of Sustainable Packaging
Challenges
Recycling & Environmental Concerns

AMA Research follow a focused and realistic research framework that provides the ability to study the crucial market dynamics in several regions across the world. Moreover, an in-depth assessment is mostly conducted by our analysts on geographical regions to provide clients and businesses the opportunity to dominate in niche markets and expand in emerging markets across the globe. This market research study also showcase the spontaneously changing Vendors landscape impacting the growth of the market. Furthermore, our market researchers extensively analyse the products and services offered by multiple players competing to increase their market share and presence.

Customization in the Report
AMA Research features not only specific market forecasts, but also include significant value-added commentary on:
- Market Trends
- Technological Trends and Innovations
- Market Maturity Indicators
- Growth Drivers and Constraints
- New Entrants into the Market & Entry/Exit Barriers
- To Seize Powerful Market Opportunities
- Identify Key Business Segments, Market Proposition & Gap Analysis

Against this Challenging Backdrop, Agricultural Packaging Study Sheds Light on
— The Agricultural Packaging Market status quo and key characteristics. To end this, Analyst at AMA organize and took survey of the Agricultural Packaging industry Vendors. The resultant snapshot serves as a basis for understanding why and how the industry can be expected to change.
— Where Agricultural Packaging industry is heading and what are the top priorities. Insights are drawn from financial analysis, the survey and interviews with key executives and industry experts.
— How every company in this diverse set of Vendors can best navigate the emerging competition landscape and follow a strategy that helps them position to hold value they currently claim, or capture the new addressable opportunity.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Pouches & bags
  • Drums
  • Bottles & cans
  • Others (Clamshells, Trays, and Others)
By Application
  • Chemical Pesticides
  • Chemical Fertilizers
  • Biologicals
By Material
  • Plastic (Rigid, and Flexible)
  • Metal
  • Paper & paperboards
  • Composite materials
  • Others

By Barrier Strength
  • Medium
  • High
  • Low

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Growing Trade of Agrochemicals
      • 3.2.2. Improved Shelf Life of Agrochemicals & Biologicals
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. Recycling & Environmental Concerns
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Agricultural Packaging, by Type, Application, Material, Barrier Strength and Region (value and price ) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Agricultural Packaging (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Agricultural Packaging by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Pouches & bags
        • 5.2.1.2. Drums
        • 5.2.1.3. Bottles & cans
        • 5.2.1.4. Others (Clamshells, Trays, and Others)
      • 5.2.2. Global Agricultural Packaging by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Chemical Pesticides
        • 5.2.2.2. Chemical Fertilizers
        • 5.2.2.3. Biologicals
      • 5.2.3. Global Agricultural Packaging by: Material (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Plastic (Rigid, and Flexible)
        • 5.2.3.2. Metal
        • 5.2.3.3. Paper & paperboards
        • 5.2.3.4. Composite materials
        • 5.2.3.5. Others
      • 5.2.4. Global Agricultural Packaging by: Barrier Strength (Value)
        • 5.2.4.1. Medium
        • 5.2.4.2. High
        • 5.2.4.3. Low
      • 5.2.5. Global Agricultural Packaging Region
        • 5.2.5.1. South America
          • 5.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.5.2.1. China
          • 5.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.5.2.3. India
          • 5.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.5.3. Europe
          • 5.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.5.3.2. France
          • 5.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.5.4. MEA
          • 5.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.5.5. North America
          • 5.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 5.3. Global Agricultural Packaging (Price)
      • 5.3.1. Global Agricultural Packaging by: Type (Price)
  • 6. Agricultural Packaging: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Amcor Limited (Australia)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Bemis Company, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Greif, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Mondi Group (Austria)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Packaging Corporation of America (United States)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. NNZ Group (The Netherlands)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. LC Packaging International B.V (The Netherlands)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. ProAmpac LLC (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Kenvos Biotech Co., Ltd. (China)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. Crown Holdings Incorporated (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Agricultural Packaging Sale, by Type, Application, Material, Barrier Strength and Region (value and price ) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Agricultural Packaging (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Agricultural Packaging by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Pouches & bags
        • 7.2.1.2. Drums
        • 7.2.1.3. Bottles & cans
        • 7.2.1.4. Others (Clamshells, Trays, and Others)
      • 7.2.2. Global Agricultural Packaging by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Chemical Pesticides
        • 7.2.2.2. Chemical Fertilizers
        • 7.2.2.3. Biologicals
      • 7.2.3. Global Agricultural Packaging by: Material (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Plastic (Rigid, and Flexible)
        • 7.2.3.2. Metal
        • 7.2.3.3. Paper & paperboards
        • 7.2.3.4. Composite materials
        • 7.2.3.5. Others
      • 7.2.4. Global Agricultural Packaging by: Barrier Strength (Value)
        • 7.2.4.1. Medium
        • 7.2.4.2. High
        • 7.2.4.3. Low
      • 7.2.5. Global Agricultural Packaging Region
        • 7.2.5.1. South America
          • 7.2.5.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.5.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.5.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.5.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.5.2.1. China
          • 7.2.5.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.5.2.3. India
          • 7.2.5.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.5.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.5.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.5.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.5.3. Europe
          • 7.2.5.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.5.3.2. France
          • 7.2.5.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.5.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.5.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.5.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.5.4. MEA
          • 7.2.5.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.5.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.5.5. North America
          • 7.2.5.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.5.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.5.5.3. Mexico
    • 7.3. Global Agricultural Packaging (Price)
      • 7.3.1. Global Agricultural Packaging by: Type (Price)
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Agricultural Packaging: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Agricultural Packaging Pouches & bags , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Agricultural Packaging Drums , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Agricultural Packaging Bottles & cans , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 5. Agricultural Packaging Others (Clamshells, Trays, and Others) , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Agricultural Packaging: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 7. Agricultural Packaging Chemical Pesticides , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 8. Agricultural Packaging Chemical Fertilizers , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Agricultural Packaging Biologicals , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Agricultural Packaging: by Material(USD Million)
  • Table 11. Agricultural Packaging Plastic (Rigid, and Flexible) , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 12. Agricultural Packaging Metal , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Agricultural Packaging Paper & paperboards , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. Agricultural Packaging Composite materials , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. Agricultural Packaging Others , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. Agricultural Packaging: by Barrier Strength(USD Million)
  • Table 17. Agricultural Packaging Medium , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. Agricultural Packaging High , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Agricultural Packaging Low , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. South America Agricultural Packaging, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. South America Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. South America Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. South America Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. South America Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Brazil Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. Brazil Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Brazil Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Brazil Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. Argentina Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Argentina Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. Argentina Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. Argentina Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. Rest of South America Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. Rest of South America Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Rest of South America Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Rest of South America Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. China Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. China Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. China Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. China Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. Japan Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. Japan Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. Japan Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Japan Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. India Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. India Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. India Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. India Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. South Korea Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. South Korea Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. South Korea Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. South Korea Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. Taiwan Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. Taiwan Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. Taiwan Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. Taiwan Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. Australia Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. Australia Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Australia Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. Australia Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. Germany Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. Germany Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. Germany Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. Germany Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. France Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. France Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. France Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. France Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. Italy Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. Italy Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. Italy Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. Italy Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. United Kingdom Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. United Kingdom Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. United Kingdom Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. United Kingdom Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. Netherlands Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Netherlands Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Netherlands Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Netherlands Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Rest of Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Rest of Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Rest of Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 98. Rest of Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 99. MEA Agricultural Packaging, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 100. MEA Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 101. MEA Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 102. MEA Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 103. MEA Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 104. Middle East Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 105. Middle East Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 106. Middle East Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 107. Middle East Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 108. Africa Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 109. Africa Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 110. Africa Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 111. Africa Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 112. North America Agricultural Packaging, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 113. North America Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 114. North America Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 115. North America Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 116. North America Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 117. United States Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 118. United States Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 119. United States Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 120. United States Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 121. Canada Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 122. Canada Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 123. Canada Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 124. Canada Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 125. Mexico Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 126. Mexico Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 127. Mexico Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 128. Mexico Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 129. Agricultural Packaging: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 130. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 131. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 132. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 133. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 134. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 135. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 136. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 137. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 138. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 139. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 140. Agricultural Packaging: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 141. Agricultural Packaging Pouches & bags , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 142. Agricultural Packaging Drums , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 143. Agricultural Packaging Bottles & cans , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 144. Agricultural Packaging Others (Clamshells, Trays, and Others) , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 145. Agricultural Packaging: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 146. Agricultural Packaging Chemical Pesticides , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. Agricultural Packaging Chemical Fertilizers , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 148. Agricultural Packaging Biologicals , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. Agricultural Packaging: by Material(USD Million)
  • Table 150. Agricultural Packaging Plastic (Rigid, and Flexible) , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. Agricultural Packaging Metal , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. Agricultural Packaging Paper & paperboards , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 153. Agricultural Packaging Composite materials , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 154. Agricultural Packaging Others , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. Agricultural Packaging: by Barrier Strength(USD Million)
  • Table 156. Agricultural Packaging Medium , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. Agricultural Packaging High , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. Agricultural Packaging Low , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. South America Agricultural Packaging, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. South America Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. South America Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. South America Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. South America Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Brazil Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. Brazil Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. Brazil Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. Brazil Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. Argentina Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. Argentina Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Argentina Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Argentina Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. Rest of South America Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. Rest of South America Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. Rest of South America Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Rest of South America Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. China Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. China Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. China Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. China Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Japan Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Japan Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. Japan Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. Japan Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. India Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. India Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. India Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. India Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. South Korea Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. South Korea Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. South Korea Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. South Korea Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. Taiwan Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. Taiwan Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. Taiwan Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. Taiwan Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. Australia Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. Australia Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. Australia Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. Australia Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 205. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 206. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 207. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 208. Rest of Asia-Pacific Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 209. Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 210. Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 211. Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 212. Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 213. Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 214. Germany Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 215. Germany Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 216. Germany Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 217. Germany Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 218. France Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 219. France Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 220. France Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 221. France Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 222. Italy Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 223. Italy Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 224. Italy Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 225. Italy Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 226. United Kingdom Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 227. United Kingdom Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 228. United Kingdom Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 229. United Kingdom Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 230. Netherlands Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 231. Netherlands Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 232. Netherlands Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 233. Netherlands Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 234. Rest of Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 235. Rest of Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 236. Rest of Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 237. Rest of Europe Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 238. MEA Agricultural Packaging, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 239. MEA Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 240. MEA Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 241. MEA Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 242. MEA Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 243. Middle East Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 244. Middle East Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 245. Middle East Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 246. Middle East Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 247. Africa Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 248. Africa Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 249. Africa Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 250. Africa Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 251. North America Agricultural Packaging, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 252. North America Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 253. North America Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 254. North America Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 255. North America Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 256. United States Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 257. United States Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 258. United States Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 259. United States Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 260. Canada Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 261. Canada Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 262. Canada Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 263. Canada Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 264. Mexico Agricultural Packaging, by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 265. Mexico Agricultural Packaging, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 266. Mexico Agricultural Packaging, by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 267. Mexico Agricultural Packaging, by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 268. Agricultural Packaging: by Type(USD/Units)
  • Table 269. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 270. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 271. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Agricultural Packaging: by Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Agricultural Packaging: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Agricultural Packaging: by Material USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. Global Agricultural Packaging: by Barrier Strength USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 8. South America Agricultural Packaging Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. Europe Agricultural Packaging Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. MEA Agricultural Packaging Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. North America Agricultural Packaging Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 13. Global Agricultural Packaging: by Type USD/Units (2015-2020)
  • Figure 14. Global Agricultural Packaging share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 15. Global Agricultural Packaging share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 16. Global Agricultural Packaging share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 17. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 18. Amcor Limited (Australia) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Amcor Limited (Australia) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 20. Bemis Company, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Bemis Company, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 22. Greif, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Greif, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 24. Mondi Group (Austria) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Mondi Group (Austria) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 26. Packaging Corporation of America (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Packaging Corporation of America (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 28. NNZ Group (The Netherlands) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. NNZ Group (The Netherlands) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 30. LC Packaging International B.V (The Netherlands) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. LC Packaging International B.V (The Netherlands) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 32. ProAmpac LLC (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. ProAmpac LLC (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 34. Kenvos Biotech Co., Ltd. (China) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. Kenvos Biotech Co., Ltd. (China) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 36. Crown Holdings Incorporated (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 37. Crown Holdings Incorporated (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 38. Global Agricultural Packaging: by Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 39. Global Agricultural Packaging: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 40. Global Agricultural Packaging: by Material USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 41. Global Agricultural Packaging: by Barrier Strength USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 42. South America Agricultural Packaging Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 43. Asia Pacific Agricultural Packaging Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 44. Europe Agricultural Packaging Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 45. MEA Agricultural Packaging Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 46. North America Agricultural Packaging Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 47. Global Agricultural Packaging: by Type USD/Units (2021-2026)
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Amcor Limited (Australia)
  • Bemis Company, Inc. (United States)
  • Greif, Inc. (United States)
  • Mondi Group (Austria)
  • Packaging Corporation of America (United States)
  • NNZ Group (The Netherlands)
  • LC Packaging International B.V (The Netherlands)
  • ProAmpac LLC (United States)
  • Kenvos Biotech Co., Ltd. (China)
  • Crown Holdings Incorporated (United States)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Silgan Holdings Inc. (United States) , Purity Flexpack Limited (India) , Flex-Pack (United States)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Feb 2022 240 Pages 55 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now
Global Agricultural Packaging research Quantitative research analysis
Global Agricultural Packaging research Qualitative Industry Analysis
DOWNLOAD SAMPLE PDF

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

The Agricultural Packaging market is expected to see a CAGR of 5.4% during projected year 2020 to 2026.
Top performing companies in the Global Agricultural Packaging market are Amcor Limited (Australia), Bemis Company, Inc. (United States), Greif, Inc. (United States), Mondi Group (Austria), Packaging Corporation of America (United States), NNZ Group (The Netherlands), LC Packaging International B.V (The Netherlands), ProAmpac LLC (United States), Kenvos Biotech Co., Ltd. (China) and Crown Holdings Incorporated (United States), to name a few.
Asia-Pacific is dominating the Agricultural Packaging Market.

Know More About Global Agricultural Packaging research Report?

Have a Query? Click Here

Other Related Reports

Returnable Transport Packaging Comprehensive Study by Type (IBC, Pallets, Plastic Crates, Layer Pads, Drums, Dunnage Bags), Application (Automotive, Food and Beverages, Consumer Goods, Industrial, Ot...
$ 3800
Rigid Plastic Packaging Comprehensive Study by Type (Bottles and Jars, Cups and Pots, Trays, Tubs, Others), Application (Food and Beverage, Healthcare, Cosmetics and Toiletries, Industrial, Others), ...
$ 3750
Corrugated Boxes Comprehensive Study by Type (Single Phase Corrugated Box, Single Wall Corrugated Box, Double Wall Corrugated Box, Triple Wall Corrugated Box), Application (Food & Beverage, Electroni...
$ 3650
Hot Stamping Foil Comprehensive Study by Type (Metallic, Pigment, Hologram), Application (Cosmetic, Home Appliances, Consumer Electronics, Cigarette & Wine Packaging, Automobile, Others), Sales Chann...
$ 3450
Intelligent Packaging Comprehensive Study by Type (Active Intelligent Packaging, Controlled Intelligent Packaging, Smart Intelligent Packaging), Application (Dairy Products, Meat & Seafood, Bakery Pr...
$ 3750
Active and Intelligent Packaging Comprehensive Study by Type (Active Packaging, Intelligent Packaging), Application (Food & Beverages, Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare, Personal Care & Cosmetics, Consume...
$ 3800