Global Coal Bed Methane

Coal Bed Methane Comprehensive Study by Application (Power Generation, Industrial Utilisation, Residential Utilisation, Commercial Utilisation, Transportation), Fracturing Fluid Type (Water Requirement, Chemical Additive Requirement, Proppant Requirement), Technology Type (Hydraulic Fracturing, Horizontal Drilling, CO2 Sequestration) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2026

Coal Bed Methane Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2022-2027 | CAGR: 1.9%  

Access Sample Report Make An Enquiry Before Purchase
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
Coal Bed Methane Market Scope
Coal bed methane (CBM), an unconventional source natural gas, is naturally produced during the geologic process of converting plant material to coal (coalification). CBM has considerable potential as an abundant clean energy supply, to help replace other diminishing hydrocarbon reserves. For instance, India has the fifth largest proven coal reserves in the world and thus holds significant prospects for exploration and exploitation of CBM.

According to AMA, the Global Coal Bed Methane market is expected to see growth rate of 1.9%

Research Analyst at AMA estimates that Global Manufacturers will contribute to the maximum growth of Global Coal Bed Methane market throughout the predicted period.

Arrow Energy Ltd. (Australia), BG Group PLC (United Kingdom), Santos Ltd. (Australia), Origin Energy Ltd. (Australia), BP PLC (United Kingdom), EnCana Corp. (Canada), Petronas (Malaysia), Metgasco Ltd. (Australia), China United Coal Bed Methane Corp. Ltd. (China), ConocoPhillips Company (United States), Bow Energy Ltd. (Indonesia), Black Diamond Energy (United States), Dart Energy Corporation (United States), Great Eastern Energy Corp. Ltd. (India) and Green Dragon Gas Ltd. (China) are some of the key players that are part of study coverage. Additionally, the Manufacturers which are also part of the research are Halliburton Co (United States), Metgasco Ltd. (Australia), Reliance Power Limited (India) and Senex Energy Limited (Australia).

About Approach
The research aims to propose a patent-based approach in searching for potential technology partners as a supporting tool for enabling open innovation. The study also proposes a systematic searching process of technology partners as a
preliminary step to select the emerging and key players that are involved in implementing market estimations. While patent analysis is employed to overcome the aforementioned data- and process-related limitations, as expenses occurred in that technology allows us to estimate the market size by evolving segments as target market from total available market.

Segmentation Overview
The study have segmented the market of Global Coal Bed Methane market , by Application (Power Generation, Industrial Utilisation, Residential Utilisation, Commercial Utilisation and Transportation) and Region with country level break-up.

On the basis of geography, the market of Coal Bed Methane has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico).


The United Kingdom government owns the methane associated with coal and regulates the rights to the gas. The government passes its ownership to the licensee when methane is recovered. According to the United Kingdom department for business enterprise and regulatory reform, mine gas is considered a petroleum product, thus the regulation of rights did not rest with the Coal Authority.

Market Trend
  • Increasing Need Sustainable Energy
  • Growing Popularity has a Profound Impact on Upcoming Fossil Fuel-Based Power Projects Worldwide

Market Drivers
  • Surging Benefits to Coal Mining Industry Across the Globe
  • Ongoing Natural Gas Pipeline Projects in Both Developed and Developing Economies
  • Efforts to Diversify Fuel Mix

Opportunities
  • Increasing Demand of Power Generation in Developing Economies
  • Surging Focus on the Production of Natural Gas from Unconventional Reserves

Restraints
  • Huge Initial Capital Commitment for Well Drilling, Stimulation, and Water Handling
  • Environmental Concerns In the Development of Coal Bed Methane

Challenges
  • High Dependency on Newer Technology and Development


Key Target Audience
Coal Bed Methane Miners, Technology Providers, Government Organisations, Power Generations Companies, End Users and Others

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Application
  • Power Generation
  • Industrial Utilisation
  • Residential Utilisation
  • Commercial Utilisation
  • Transportation
By Fracturing Fluid Type
  • Water Requirement
  • Chemical Additive Requirement
  • Proppant Requirement

By Technology Type
  • Hydraulic Fracturing
  • Horizontal Drilling
  • CO2 Sequestration

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Surging Benefits to Coal Mining Industry Across the Globe
      • 3.2.2. Ongoing Natural Gas Pipeline Projects in Both Developed and Developing Economies
      • 3.2.3. Efforts to Diversify Fuel Mix
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. High Dependency on Newer Technology and Development
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Increasing Need Sustainable Energy
      • 3.4.2. Growing Popularity has a Profound Impact on Upcoming Fossil Fuel-Based Power Projects Worldwide
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Coal Bed Methane, by Application, Fracturing Fluid Type, Technology Type and Region (value and price ) (2015-2020)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Coal Bed Methane (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Coal Bed Methane by: Application (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Power Generation
        • 5.2.1.2. Industrial Utilisation
        • 5.2.1.3. Residential Utilisation
        • 5.2.1.4. Commercial Utilisation
        • 5.2.1.5. Transportation
      • 5.2.2. Global Coal Bed Methane by: Fracturing Fluid Type (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Water Requirement
        • 5.2.2.2. Chemical Additive Requirement
        • 5.2.2.3. Proppant Requirement
      • 5.2.3. Global Coal Bed Methane by: Technology Type (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Hydraulic Fracturing
        • 5.2.3.2. Horizontal Drilling
        • 5.2.3.3. CO2 Sequestration
      • 5.2.4. Global Coal Bed Methane Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
    • 5.3. Global Coal Bed Methane (Price)
  • 6. Coal Bed Methane: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2020)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. Arrow Energy Ltd. (Australia)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. BG Group PLC (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Santos Ltd. (Australia)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Origin Energy Ltd. (Australia)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. BP PLC (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. EnCana Corp. (Canada)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. Petronas (Malaysia)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Metgasco Ltd. (Australia)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. China United Coal Bed Methane Corp. Ltd. (China)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.10. ConocoPhillips Company (United States)
        • 6.4.10.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.10.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.10.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.10.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.11. Bow Energy Ltd. (Indonesia)
        • 6.4.11.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.11.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.11.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.11.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.12. Black Diamond Energy (United States)
        • 6.4.12.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.12.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.12.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.12.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.13. Dart Energy Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.13.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.13.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.13.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.13.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.14. Great Eastern Energy Corp. Ltd. (India)
        • 6.4.14.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.14.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.14.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.14.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.15. Green Dragon Gas Ltd. (China)
        • 6.4.15.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.15.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.15.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.15.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Coal Bed Methane Sale, by Application, Fracturing Fluid Type, Technology Type and Region (value and price ) (2021-2026)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Coal Bed Methane (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Coal Bed Methane by: Application (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Power Generation
        • 7.2.1.2. Industrial Utilisation
        • 7.2.1.3. Residential Utilisation
        • 7.2.1.4. Commercial Utilisation
        • 7.2.1.5. Transportation
      • 7.2.2. Global Coal Bed Methane by: Fracturing Fluid Type (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Water Requirement
        • 7.2.2.2. Chemical Additive Requirement
        • 7.2.2.3. Proppant Requirement
      • 7.2.3. Global Coal Bed Methane by: Technology Type (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Hydraulic Fracturing
        • 7.2.3.2. Horizontal Drilling
        • 7.2.3.3. CO2 Sequestration
      • 7.2.4. Global Coal Bed Methane Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
    • 7.3. Global Coal Bed Methane (Price)
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Coal Bed Methane: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Coal Bed Methane Power Generation , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 3. Coal Bed Methane Industrial Utilisation , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 4. Coal Bed Methane Residential Utilisation , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 5. Coal Bed Methane Commercial Utilisation , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 6. Coal Bed Methane Transportation , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 7. Coal Bed Methane: by Fracturing Fluid Type(USD Million)
  • Table 8. Coal Bed Methane Water Requirement , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 9. Coal Bed Methane Chemical Additive Requirement , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 10. Coal Bed Methane Proppant Requirement , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 11. Coal Bed Methane: by Technology Type(USD Million)
  • Table 12. Coal Bed Methane Hydraulic Fracturing , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 13. Coal Bed Methane Horizontal Drilling , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 14. Coal Bed Methane CO2 Sequestration , by Region USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 15. South America Coal Bed Methane, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 16. South America Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 17. South America Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 18. South America Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 19. Brazil Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 20. Brazil Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 21. Brazil Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 22. Argentina Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 23. Argentina Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 24. Argentina Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 25. Rest of South America Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 26. Rest of South America Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 27. Rest of South America Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 28. Asia Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 29. Asia Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 30. Asia Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 31. Asia Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 32. China Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 33. China Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 34. China Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 35. Japan Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 36. Japan Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 37. Japan Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 38. India Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 39. India Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 40. India Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 41. South Korea Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 42. South Korea Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 43. South Korea Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 44. Taiwan Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 45. Taiwan Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 46. Taiwan Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 47. Australia Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 48. Australia Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 49. Australia Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 50. Rest of Asia-Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 51. Rest of Asia-Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 52. Rest of Asia-Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 53. Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 54. Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 55. Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 56. Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 57. Germany Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 58. Germany Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 59. Germany Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 60. France Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 61. France Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 62. France Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 63. Italy Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 64. Italy Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 65. Italy Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 66. United Kingdom Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 67. United Kingdom Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 68. United Kingdom Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 69. Netherlands Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 70. Netherlands Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 71. Netherlands Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 72. Rest of Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 73. Rest of Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 74. Rest of Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 75. MEA Coal Bed Methane, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 76. MEA Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 77. MEA Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 78. MEA Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 79. Middle East Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 80. Middle East Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 81. Middle East Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 82. Africa Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 83. Africa Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 84. Africa Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 85. North America Coal Bed Methane, by Country USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 86. North America Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 87. North America Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 88. North America Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 89. United States Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 90. United States Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 91. United States Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 92. Canada Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 93. Canada Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 94. Canada Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 95. Mexico Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 96. Mexico Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 97. Mexico Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Table 98. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 99. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 100. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 101. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 102. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 103. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 104. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 105. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 106. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 107. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 108. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 109. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 110. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 111. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 112. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 113. Coal Bed Methane: by Application(USD Million)
  • Table 114. Coal Bed Methane Power Generation , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 115. Coal Bed Methane Industrial Utilisation , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 116. Coal Bed Methane Residential Utilisation , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 117. Coal Bed Methane Commercial Utilisation , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 118. Coal Bed Methane Transportation , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 119. Coal Bed Methane: by Fracturing Fluid Type(USD Million)
  • Table 120. Coal Bed Methane Water Requirement , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 121. Coal Bed Methane Chemical Additive Requirement , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 122. Coal Bed Methane Proppant Requirement , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 123. Coal Bed Methane: by Technology Type(USD Million)
  • Table 124. Coal Bed Methane Hydraulic Fracturing , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 125. Coal Bed Methane Horizontal Drilling , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 126. Coal Bed Methane CO2 Sequestration , by Region USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 127. South America Coal Bed Methane, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 128. South America Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 129. South America Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 130. South America Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 131. Brazil Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 132. Brazil Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 133. Brazil Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 134. Argentina Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 135. Argentina Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 136. Argentina Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 137. Rest of South America Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 138. Rest of South America Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 139. Rest of South America Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 140. Asia Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 141. Asia Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 142. Asia Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 143. Asia Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 144. China Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 145. China Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 146. China Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 147. Japan Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 148. Japan Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 149. Japan Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 150. India Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 151. India Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 152. India Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 153. South Korea Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 154. South Korea Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 155. South Korea Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 156. Taiwan Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 157. Taiwan Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 158. Taiwan Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 159. Australia Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 160. Australia Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 161. Australia Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 162. Rest of Asia-Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 163. Rest of Asia-Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 164. Rest of Asia-Pacific Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 165. Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 166. Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 167. Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 168. Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 169. Germany Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 170. Germany Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 171. Germany Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 172. France Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 173. France Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 174. France Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 175. Italy Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 176. Italy Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 177. Italy Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 178. United Kingdom Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 179. United Kingdom Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 180. United Kingdom Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 181. Netherlands Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 182. Netherlands Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 183. Netherlands Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 184. Rest of Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 185. Rest of Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 186. Rest of Europe Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 187. MEA Coal Bed Methane, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 188. MEA Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 189. MEA Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 190. MEA Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 191. Middle East Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 192. Middle East Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 193. Middle East Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 194. Africa Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 195. Africa Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 196. Africa Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 197. North America Coal Bed Methane, by Country USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 198. North America Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 199. North America Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 200. North America Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 201. United States Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 202. United States Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 203. United States Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 204. Canada Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 205. Canada Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 206. Canada Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 207. Mexico Coal Bed Methane, by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 208. Mexico Coal Bed Methane, by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 209. Mexico Coal Bed Methane, by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Table 210. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 211. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 212. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Coal Bed Methane: by Application USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 5. Global Coal Bed Methane: by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 6. Global Coal Bed Methane: by Technology Type USD Million (2015-2020)
  • Figure 7. South America Coal Bed Methane Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Coal Bed Methane Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Coal Bed Methane Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Coal Bed Methane Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Coal Bed Methane Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Coal Bed Methane share by Players 2020 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Coal Bed Methane share by Players (Top 3) 2020(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Coal Bed Methane share by Players (Top 5) 2020(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. Arrow Energy Ltd. (Australia) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. Arrow Energy Ltd. (Australia) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 18. BG Group PLC (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. BG Group PLC (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 20. Santos Ltd. (Australia) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Santos Ltd. (Australia) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 22. Origin Energy Ltd. (Australia) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Origin Energy Ltd. (Australia) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 24. BP PLC (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. BP PLC (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 26. EnCana Corp. (Canada) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. EnCana Corp. (Canada) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 28. Petronas (Malaysia) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. Petronas (Malaysia) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 30. Metgasco Ltd. (Australia) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. Metgasco Ltd. (Australia) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 32. China United Coal Bed Methane Corp. Ltd. (China) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. China United Coal Bed Methane Corp. Ltd. (China) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 34. ConocoPhillips Company (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 35. ConocoPhillips Company (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 36. Bow Energy Ltd. (Indonesia) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 37. Bow Energy Ltd. (Indonesia) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 38. Black Diamond Energy (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 39. Black Diamond Energy (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 40. Dart Energy Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 41. Dart Energy Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 42. Great Eastern Energy Corp. Ltd. (India) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 43. Great Eastern Energy Corp. Ltd. (India) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 44. Green Dragon Gas Ltd. (China) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 45. Green Dragon Gas Ltd. (China) Revenue: by Geography 2020
  • Figure 46. Global Coal Bed Methane: by Application USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 47. Global Coal Bed Methane: by Fracturing Fluid Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 48. Global Coal Bed Methane: by Technology Type USD Million (2021-2026)
  • Figure 49. South America Coal Bed Methane Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 50. Asia Pacific Coal Bed Methane Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 51. Europe Coal Bed Methane Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 52. MEA Coal Bed Methane Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 53. North America Coal Bed Methane Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • Arrow Energy Ltd. (Australia)
  • BG Group PLC (United Kingdom)
  • Santos Ltd. (Australia)
  • Origin Energy Ltd. (Australia)
  • BP PLC (United Kingdom)
  • EnCana Corp. (Canada)
  • Petronas (Malaysia)
  • Metgasco Ltd. (Australia)
  • China United Coal Bed Methane Corp. Ltd. (China)
  • ConocoPhillips Company (United States)
  • Bow Energy Ltd. (Indonesia)
  • Black Diamond Energy (United States)
  • Dart Energy Corporation (United States)
  • Great Eastern Energy Corp. Ltd. (India)
  • Green Dragon Gas Ltd. (China)
Additional players considered in the study are as follows:
Halliburton Co (United States) , Metgasco Ltd. (Australia) , Reliance Power Limited (India) , Senex Energy Limited (Australia)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Feb 2022 220 Pages 65 Tables Base Year: 2021 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now
Global Coal Bed Methane Quantitative research analysis
Global Coal Bed Methane Qualitative Industry Analysis
DOWNLOAD SAMPLE PDF

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

The Coal Bed Methane study can be customized to meet your requirements. The market size breakdown by type [], by end use application [Power Generation, Industrial Utilisation, Residential Utilisation, Commercial Utilisation and Transportation].
The Coal Bed Methane Market is gaining popularity and expected to see strong valuation by 2026.
According to AMA, the Global Coal Bed Methane market is expected to see growth rate of 1.9%.

Know More About Global Coal Bed Methane Report?

Have a Query? Click Here

Other Related Reports

Solar Pump Inverter Comprehensive Study by Type (Single Purpose, Multipurpose), Application (Commercial Use, Home Use), Distribution Channel (Ecommerce, Retail Stores) Players and Region - Global Mar...
$ 3500
Concentrated Solar Thermal Comprehensive Study by Application (Residential, Industry, Other), Storage (With Storage (Molten Salt, Others), Without Storage), Technology (Parabolic Troughs, Fresnel Sys...
$ 3650
Ionic Exchange Based Liquid Nuclear Waste Treatment Comprehensive Study by Application (Industrial, Utility), Liquid Source (Boiling Water Reactors, Gas-cooled Reactors, Pressurized Water Reactors, P...
$ 3750
Tree Transplanters Comprehensive Study by Type (1-5 Row, 6-10 Row), Application (Residential, Orchard, Forestry), Trunk Diameter (3-6 inches, 7-10 inches, 11-14 inches) Players and Region - Global Ma...
$ 3500
Aviation Battery Comprehensive Study by Type (Nickel Cadmium Battery, Lead Acid Battery, Lithium Ion Battery), Application (Propulsion, Auxiliary Power Unit (APU), Emergency, Others), Power Density (...
$ 3650
Solar Energy Comprehensive Study by Type (Photovoltaic Solar Energy, Solar Thermal Energy, Passive Solar Energy), Application (Residential, Commercial, Industrial), Solar Module (Monocrystalline Sili...
$ 3800