Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Market

Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Comprehensive Study by Type (Strain Sensors, Crack Detection Sensors, Vibration Sensors, Tilt Sensors, Piezometers), Component (Sensor Network, Data Processing System, Health Evaluation System) Players and Region - Global Market Outlook to 2032

Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Market by XX Submarkets | Forecast Years 2025-2032  

Access Sample Report Make An Enquiry Before Purchase
  • Summary
  • Market Segments
  • Table of Content
  • List of Table & Figures
  • Players Profiled
About Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges
Structural Health Monitoring, in short SHM, refers to the process of continuously or periodically assessing the condition of structures like buildings and bridges through sensors, data collection, and analytical tools. The purpose is to detect and assess any signs of damage, deterioration, or potential failure before they become critical, thereby ensuring the safety and longevity of these structures. SHM systems usually require the use of instruments including accelerometers, strain gauges, and temperature sensors at different points of a structure. These instruments will monitor physical parameters, such as vibrations, stress and strain, displacements, and temperature change. Data collected from these instruments is then analyzed, and abnormalities that may lead to problems like cracks, corrosion, and settlement are indicated. Many are the advantages of SHM. This allows for proactive maintenance, with a very low chance of failure and cost repairs. Real-time monitoring allows for the early warning of potential issues, which is essential in many critical infrastructure projects, such as those for bridges with high traffic volumes.

AttributesDetails
Study Period2020-2032
Base Year2024
UnitValue (USD Million)


The companies are exploring the market by adopting mergers & acquisitions, expansions, investments, new service launches and collaborations as their preferred strategies. The players are exploring new geographies through expansions and acquisitions to avail a competitive advantage through combined synergies. Established and emerging Players should take a closer view at their existing organizations and reinvent traditional business and operating models to adapt to the future.

National Instruments Corporation (United States), Sixense Systems (France), Digitexx Data Systems, Inc. (United States), Acellent Technologies, Inc.(United States), Strainstall UK Limited (United Kingdom), Nova Metrix LLC (United States), COWI A/S (France), Geocomp Corporation (United States) and Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH (Germany) are some of the key players that are part of study coverage.

Segmentation Overview
AMA Research has segmented the market of Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges market by and Region.



On the basis of geography, the market of Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges has been segmented into South America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), Europe (Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Rest of Europe), MEA (Middle East, Africa), North America (United States, Canada, Mexico). If we see Market by Type, the sub-segment i.e. Strain Sensors will boost the Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth. If we see Market by Component, the sub-segment i.e. Sensor Network will boost the Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges market. Additionally, the rising demand from SMEs and various industry verticals gives enough cushion to market growth.

Influencing Trend:
Use of Integrated Vehicle Health Management

Market Growth Drivers:
Growth in Infrastructure Investments and Increasing Concerns related to Natural Calamities

Challenges:
The Need for Data Processing and Management and Installation of a Large Number of Sensing Points for Large Complex Structures

Restraints:
High Installation Cost and Slow Growth in Developing and Underdeveloped Countries

Opportunities:
Increasing Government Initiatives towards SHM System and A Requirement of Wireless Sensor Technologies and RFIDs (Radio Frequency Identification)




Key Target Audience
Structural Health Monitoring System Manufacturer, Sensor Manufacturer, Government Bodies and Research Organisation and Construction Industry

About Approach
To evaluate and validate the market size various sources including primary and secondary analysis is utilized. AMA Research follows regulatory standards such as NAICS/SIC/ICB/TRCB, to have a better understanding of the market. The market study is conducted on basis of more than 200 companies dealing in the market regional as well as global areas with the purpose to understand the companies positioning regarding the market value, volume, and their market share for regional as well as global.

Further to bring relevance specific to any niche market we set and apply a number of criteria like Geographic Footprints, Regional Segments of Revenue, Operational Centres, etc. The next step is to finalize a team (In-House + Data Agencies) who then starts collecting C & D level executives and profiles, Industry experts, Opinion leaders, etc., and work towards appointment generation.

The primary research is performed by taking the interviews of executives of various companies dealing in the market as well as using the survey reports, research institute, and latest research reports. Meanwhile, the analyst team keeps preparing a set of questionnaires, and after getting the appointee list; the target audience is then tapped and segregated with various mediums and channels that are feasible for making connections that including email communication, telephonic, skype, LinkedIn Group & InMail, Community Forums, Community Forums, open Survey, SurveyMonkey, etc.

Report Objectives / Segmentation Covered

By Type
  • Strain Sensors
  • Crack Detection Sensors
  • Vibration Sensors
  • Tilt Sensors
  • Piezometers

By Component
  • Sensor Network
  • Data Processing System
  • Health Evaluation System

By Regions
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Taiwan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Netherlands
    • Rest of Europe
  • MEA
    • Middle East
    • Africa
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • 1. Market Overview
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.2. Scope/Objective of the Study
      • 1.2.1. Research Objective
  • 2. Executive Summary
    • 2.1. Introduction
  • 3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.1. Introduction
    • 3.2. Market Drivers
      • 3.2.1. Growth in Infrastructure Investments
      • 3.2.2. Increasing Concerns related to Natural Calamities
    • 3.3. Market Challenges
      • 3.3.1. The Need for Data Processing and Management
      • 3.3.2. Installation of a Large Number of Sensing Points for Large Complex Structures
    • 3.4. Market Trends
      • 3.4.1. Use of Integrated Vehicle Health Management
  • 4. Market Factor Analysis
    • 4.1. Porters Five Forces
    • 4.2. Supply/Value Chain
    • 4.3. PESTEL analysis
    • 4.4. Market Entropy
    • 4.5. Patent/Trademark Analysis
  • 5. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type, Component and Region (value) (2019-2024)
    • 5.1. Introduction
    • 5.2. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges (Value)
      • 5.2.1. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.1.1. Strain Sensors
        • 5.2.1.2. Crack Detection Sensors
        • 5.2.1.3. Vibration Sensors
        • 5.2.1.4. Tilt Sensors
        • 5.2.1.5. Piezometers
      • 5.2.2. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges by: Type (Value)
        • 5.2.2.1. Strain Sensors
        • 5.2.2.2. Crack Detection Sensors
        • 5.2.2.3. Vibration Sensors
        • 5.2.2.4. Tilt Sensors
        • 5.2.2.5. Piezometers
      • 5.2.3. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges by: Component (Value)
        • 5.2.3.1. Sensor Network
        • 5.2.3.2. Data Processing System
        • 5.2.3.3. Health Evaluation System
      • 5.2.4. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Region
        • 5.2.4.1. South America
          • 5.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 5.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 5.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 5.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 5.2.4.2.1. China
          • 5.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 5.2.4.2.3. India
          • 5.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 5.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 5.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 5.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 5.2.4.3. Europe
          • 5.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 5.2.4.3.2. France
          • 5.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 5.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 5.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 5.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 5.2.4.4. MEA
          • 5.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 5.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 5.2.4.5. North America
          • 5.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 5.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 5.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 6. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: Manufacturers/Players Analysis
    • 6.1. Competitive Landscape
      • 6.1.1. Market Share Analysis
        • 6.1.1.1. Top 3
        • 6.1.1.2. Top 5
    • 6.2. Peer Group Analysis (2024)
    • 6.3. BCG Matrix
    • 6.4. Company Profile
      • 6.4.1. National Instruments Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.1.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.1.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.1.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.1.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.2. Sixense Systems (France)
        • 6.4.2.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.2.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.2.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.2.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.3. Digitexx Data Systems, Inc. (United States)
        • 6.4.3.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.3.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.3.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.3.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.4. Acellent Technologies, Inc.(United States)
        • 6.4.4.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.4.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.4.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.4.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.5. Strainstall UK Limited (United Kingdom)
        • 6.4.5.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.5.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.5.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.5.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.6. Nova Metrix LLC (United States)
        • 6.4.6.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.6.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.6.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.6.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.7. COWI A/S (France)
        • 6.4.7.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.7.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.7.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.7.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.8. Geocomp Corporation (United States)
        • 6.4.8.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.8.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.8.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.8.4. SWOT Analysis
      • 6.4.9. Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH (Germany)
        • 6.4.9.1. Business Overview
        • 6.4.9.2. Products/Services Offerings
        • 6.4.9.3. Financial Analysis
        • 6.4.9.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 7. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Sale, by Type, Component and Region (value) (2027-2032)
    • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.2. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges (Value)
      • 7.2.1. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.1.1. Strain Sensors
        • 7.2.1.2. Crack Detection Sensors
        • 7.2.1.3. Vibration Sensors
        • 7.2.1.4. Tilt Sensors
        • 7.2.1.5. Piezometers
      • 7.2.2. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges by: Type (Value)
        • 7.2.2.1. Strain Sensors
        • 7.2.2.2. Crack Detection Sensors
        • 7.2.2.3. Vibration Sensors
        • 7.2.2.4. Tilt Sensors
        • 7.2.2.5. Piezometers
      • 7.2.3. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges by: Component (Value)
        • 7.2.3.1. Sensor Network
        • 7.2.3.2. Data Processing System
        • 7.2.3.3. Health Evaluation System
      • 7.2.4. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Region
        • 7.2.4.1. South America
          • 7.2.4.1.1. Brazil
          • 7.2.4.1.2. Argentina
          • 7.2.4.1.3. Rest of South America
        • 7.2.4.2. Asia Pacific
          • 7.2.4.2.1. China
          • 7.2.4.2.2. Japan
          • 7.2.4.2.3. India
          • 7.2.4.2.4. South Korea
          • 7.2.4.2.5. Taiwan
          • 7.2.4.2.6. Australia
          • 7.2.4.2.7. Rest of Asia-Pacific
        • 7.2.4.3. Europe
          • 7.2.4.3.1. Germany
          • 7.2.4.3.2. France
          • 7.2.4.3.3. Italy
          • 7.2.4.3.4. United Kingdom
          • 7.2.4.3.5. Netherlands
          • 7.2.4.3.6. Rest of Europe
        • 7.2.4.4. MEA
          • 7.2.4.4.1. Middle East
          • 7.2.4.4.2. Africa
        • 7.2.4.5. North America
          • 7.2.4.5.1. United States
          • 7.2.4.5.2. Canada
          • 7.2.4.5.3. Mexico
  • 8. Appendix
    • 8.1. Acronyms
  • 9. Methodology and Data Source
    • 9.1. Methodology/Research Approach
      • 9.1.1. Research Programs/Design
      • 9.1.2. Market Size Estimation
      • 9.1.3. Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
    • 9.2. Data Source
      • 9.2.1. Secondary Sources
      • 9.2.2. Primary Sources
    • 9.3. Disclaimer
List of Tables
  • Table 1. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 2. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Strain Sensors , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 3. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Crack Detection Sensors , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 4. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Vibration Sensors , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 5. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Tilt Sensors , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 6. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Piezometers , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 7. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 8. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Strain Sensors , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 9. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Crack Detection Sensors , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 10. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Vibration Sensors , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 11. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Tilt Sensors , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 12. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Piezometers , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 13. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Component(USD Million)
  • Table 14. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Sensor Network , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 15. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Data Processing System , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 16. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Health Evaluation System , by Region USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 17. South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 18. South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 19. South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 20. Brazil Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 21. Brazil Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 22. Argentina Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 23. Argentina Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 24. Rest of South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 25. Rest of South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 26. Asia Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 27. Asia Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 28. Asia Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 29. China Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 30. China Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 31. Japan Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 32. Japan Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 33. India Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 34. India Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 35. South Korea Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 36. South Korea Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 37. Taiwan Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 38. Taiwan Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 39. Australia Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 40. Australia Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 41. Rest of Asia-Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 42. Rest of Asia-Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 43. Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 44. Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 45. Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 46. Germany Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 47. Germany Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 48. France Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 49. France Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 50. Italy Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 51. Italy Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 52. United Kingdom Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 53. United Kingdom Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 54. Netherlands Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 55. Netherlands Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 56. Rest of Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 57. Rest of Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 58. MEA Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 59. MEA Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 60. MEA Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 61. Middle East Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 62. Middle East Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 63. Africa Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 64. Africa Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 65. North America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Country USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 66. North America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 67. North America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 68. United States Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 69. United States Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 70. Canada Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 71. Canada Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 72. Mexico Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 73. Mexico Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Table 74. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 75. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 76. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 77. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 78. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 79. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 80. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 81. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 82. Company Basic Information, Sales Area and Its Competitors
  • Table 83. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 84. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Strain Sensors , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 85. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Crack Detection Sensors , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 86. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Vibration Sensors , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 87. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Tilt Sensors , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 88. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Piezometers , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 89. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Type(USD Million)
  • Table 90. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Strain Sensors , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 91. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Crack Detection Sensors , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 92. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Vibration Sensors , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 93. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Tilt Sensors , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 94. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Piezometers , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 95. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Component(USD Million)
  • Table 96. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Sensor Network , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 97. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Data Processing System , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 98. Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Health Evaluation System , by Region USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 99. South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Country USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 100. South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 101. South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 102. Brazil Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 103. Brazil Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 104. Argentina Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 105. Argentina Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 106. Rest of South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 107. Rest of South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 108. Asia Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Country USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 109. Asia Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 110. Asia Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 111. China Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 112. China Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 113. Japan Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 114. Japan Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 115. India Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 116. India Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 117. South Korea Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 118. South Korea Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 119. Taiwan Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 120. Taiwan Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 121. Australia Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 122. Australia Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 123. Rest of Asia-Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 124. Rest of Asia-Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 125. Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Country USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 126. Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 127. Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 128. Germany Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 129. Germany Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 130. France Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 131. France Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 132. Italy Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 133. Italy Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 134. United Kingdom Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 135. United Kingdom Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 136. Netherlands Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 137. Netherlands Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 138. Rest of Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 139. Rest of Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 140. MEA Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Country USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 141. MEA Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 142. MEA Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 143. Middle East Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 144. Middle East Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 145. Africa Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 146. Africa Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 147. North America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Country USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 148. North America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 149. North America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 150. United States Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 151. United States Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 152. Canada Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 153. Canada Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 154. Mexico Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 155. Mexico Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges, by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Table 156. Research Programs/Design for This Report
  • Table 157. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
  • Table 158. Key Data Information from Primary Sources
List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Porters Five Forces
  • Figure 2. Supply/Value Chain
  • Figure 3. PESTEL analysis
  • Figure 4. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 5. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Type USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 6. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Component USD Million (2019-2024)
  • Figure 7. South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 8. Asia Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 9. Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 10. MEA Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 11. North America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 12. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges share by Players 2024 (%)
  • Figure 13. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges share by Players (Top 3) 2024(%)
  • Figure 14. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges share by Players (Top 5) 2024(%)
  • Figure 15. BCG Matrix for key Companies
  • Figure 16. National Instruments Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 17. National Instruments Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 18. Sixense Systems (France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 19. Sixense Systems (France) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 20. Digitexx Data Systems, Inc. (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 21. Digitexx Data Systems, Inc. (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 22. Acellent Technologies, Inc.(United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 23. Acellent Technologies, Inc.(United States) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 24. Strainstall UK Limited (United Kingdom) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 25. Strainstall UK Limited (United Kingdom) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 26. Nova Metrix LLC (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 27. Nova Metrix LLC (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 28. COWI A/S (France) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 29. COWI A/S (France) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 30. Geocomp Corporation (United States) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 31. Geocomp Corporation (United States) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 32. Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH (Germany) Revenue, Net Income and Gross profit
  • Figure 33. Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH (Germany) Revenue: by Geography 2024
  • Figure 34. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Figure 35. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Type USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Figure 36. Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges: by Component USD Million (2027-2032)
  • Figure 37. South America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 38. Asia Pacific Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 39. Europe Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 40. MEA Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Share (%), by Country
  • Figure 41. North America Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Share (%), by Country
List of companies from research coverage that are profiled in the study
  • National Instruments Corporation (United States)
  • Sixense Systems (France)
  • Digitexx Data Systems, Inc. (United States)
  • Acellent Technologies, Inc.(United States)
  • Strainstall UK Limited (United Kingdom)
  • Nova Metrix LLC (United States)
  • COWI A/S (France)
  • Geocomp Corporation (United States)
  • Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH (Germany)
Select User Access Type

Key Highlights of Report


Jan 2025 246 Pages 60 Tables Base Year: 2024 Coverage: 15+ Companies; 18 Countries

Request Sample Pages

Budget constraints? Get in touch with us for special pricing


Check Discount Now
Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Market Quantitative research analysis
Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Market Qualitative Industry Analysis
DOWNLOAD SAMPLE PDF

Talk to Our Experts

Want to Customize Study?


"We employ Market statistics, Industry benchmarking, Patent analysis, and Technological Insights to derive requirements and provide customize scope of work."

Make an Enquiry Now

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

The standard version of the report profiles players such as National Instruments Corporation (United States), Sixense Systems (France), Digitexx Data Systems, Inc. (United States), Acellent Technologies, Inc.(United States), Strainstall UK Limited (United Kingdom), Nova Metrix LLC (United States), COWI A/S (France), Geocomp Corporation (United States) and Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH (Germany) etc.
The Study can be customized subject to feasibility and data availability. Please connect with our sales representative for further information.
"Use of Integrated Vehicle Health Management" is seen as one of major influencing trends for Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Market during projected period 2024-2032.
The Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges market study includes a random mix of players, including both market leaders and some top growing emerging players. Connect with our sales executive to get a complete company list in our research coverage.

Know More About Global Structural Health Monitoring for Buildings and Bridges Market Report?

Have a Query? Click Here

Other Related Reports

HR Recruitment Service Comprehensive Study by Type (Permanent, Temporary), Role (Technical, Non-Technical), Industry Vertical (IT & Telecom, E-commerce, Manufacturing, Transportation & Logistics, BFS...
$ 3800
Frontline Workers Training Comprehensive Study by Organization Size (Small & Medium Enterprises, Large Enterprises), Industry Vertical (Oil & Gas, Marine, Energy, Manufacturing, Transportation and Lo...
$ 3800
Micro-learning Comprehensive Study by Organization Size (Large Enterprises, Small and Medium Enterprise (SMEs)), Industry Vertical (Retail, Manufacturing, Transportation and Logistics, BFSI, Telecom ...
$ 3800
Meal Voucher Comprehensive Study by Type (Physical Voucher, Digital Voucher), Organization Size (Small & Medium Enterprises, Large Enterprises), Category (Discount-Based, Fixed-Value, Meal-Specific) ...
$ 3800
Locum Tenens Staffing Comprehensive Study by Specialty (Medical, Imaging, Pharmacy, Rehab, Laboratory, Others), Staff Type (Physicians, Nurses, Therapists, Scientists, Administrative Medical Staff, O...
$ 3800
PET Bottles Recycling Comprehensive Study by Application (Food & Beverage Packaging, Personal Care & Household Products, Pharmaceutical Packaging, Industrial Packaging, Consumer Goods, Others), Bottl...
$ 3800