Global Injectable Bone Substitute Market Overview:
The injectable bone substitute refers to a synthetic, biologically organic, or inorganic combination which is inserted for the treatment of bone defects. The ideal bone substitute material should exhibit several important properties are biocompatibility, durability, vascularity and angiogenesis, bio-absorbability, cost efficiency, and availability. Market players in the injectable bone substitute market are focusing on the technological advancement in the bone substitute materials. For instance, Stryker provides an injectable bone substitute composed of tetra-calcium phosphate which offers osteointegrative and osteoconductive properties. Further, growing demand from the developing economies expected to drive the demand for injectable bone substitutes over the forecasted period
Attributes | Details |
---|
Study Period | 2017-2027 |
Base Year | 2021 |
Forecast Period | 2022-2027 |
Historical Period | 2017-2021 |
Unit | Value (USD Million) |
Customization Scope | Avail customization with purchase of this report. Add or modify country, region & or narrow down segments in the final scope subject to feasibility |
Growth Drivers
- Growing Number of Patients with Orthopedic Disorders
- Increasing Geriatric Population
Roadblocks
- Lack of Skilled Healthcare Professionals
- Stringent Government Regulations Regarding Injectable Bone Substitute
Opportunities
- Increasing Prevalence of Bone Disorders
- Growing Healthcare Infrastructure in the Developing Economies
Challenges
- Lak of Awareness in the Emerging Economies
Competitive Landscape:
Market players are focusing on partnerships, collaborations, and new product launches in order to increase their offerings in the global injectable bone substitute market. In addition, companies are focusing on increasing their client base to strengthen market position and to enhance product offerings.
Some of the key players profiled in the report are Wright Medical (United States), Zimmer Biomet (United States), Medtronic (United States), SeaSpine (United States), Johnson & Johnson (United States), Stryker (United States), Xtant Medical (United States), Graftys (France), Arthrex (United States) and Biomatlante (France). Additionally, following companies can also be profiled that are part of our coverage like Biocomposites (United Kingdom) and ORD (Taiwan). Analyst at AMA Research see United States Players to retain maximum share of Global Injectable Bone Substitute market by 2027.
“Acceding to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), most injectable bone substitutes belong to one of two major groups: by far the largest group contains products based on various calcium phosphate (CP) mixtures, whilst the smaller group consists of calcium sulfate (CS) compounds.”
What Can be Explored with the Injectable Bone Substitute Market Study
Gain Market Understanding
Identify Growth Opportunities
Analyze and Measure the Global Injectable Bone Substitute Market by Identifying Investment across various Industry Verticals
Understand the Trends that will drive Future Changes in Injectable Bone Substitute
Understand the Competitive Scenario
- Track Right Markets
- Identify the Right Verticals
Research Methodology:
The top-down and bottom-up approaches are used to estimate and validate the size of the Global Injectable Bone Substitute market.
In order to reach an exhaustive list of functional and relevant players various industry classification standards are closely followed such as NAICS, ICB, SIC to penetrate deep in important geographies by players and a thorough validation test is conducted to reach most relevant players for survey in Injectable Bone Substitute market.
In order to make priority list sorting is done based on revenue generated based on latest reporting with the help of paid databases such as Factiva, Bloomberg etc.
Finally the questionnaire is set and specifically designed to address all the necessities for primary data collection after getting prior appointment by targeting key target audience that includes Injectable Bone Substitute Providers, Research and Development Institutes, Potential Investors, Nationalized Laboratory, Government and Research Organizations, Research Organizations, and Consulting Firms and Others.
This helps us to gather the data related to players revenue, operating cycle and expense, profit along with product or service growth etc.
Almost 70-80% of data is collected through primary medium and further validation is done through various secondary sources that includes Regulators, World Bank, Association, Company Website, SEC filings, OTC BB, USPTO, EPO, Annual reports, press releases etc.